Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Series(index=DatetimeIndex(...)) constructor very slow #11433
Comments
lenolib
changed the title from
Series(index=DatetimeIndex(...)) very slow to Series(index=DatetimeIndex(...)) constructor very slow
Oct 26, 2015
|
This patch will fix it. needs an asv benchmark though. Want to do a pull-request?
|
jreback
added Timeseries Performance Effort Low Difficulty Novice and removed Effort Low
labels
Oct 26, 2015
jreback
added this to the
Next Major Release
milestone
Oct 26, 2015
jreback
added the
Effort Low
label
Oct 26, 2015
lexual
referenced
this issue
Nov 13, 2015
Merged
PERF: Faster Series construction with no data and DatetimeIndex. #11598
jreback
modified the milestone: 0.17.1, Next Major Release
Nov 13, 2015
lexual
added a commit
to lexual/pandas
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2015
|
|
lexual |
20511dd
|
jreback
closed this
in #11598
Nov 15, 2015
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
lenolib commentedOct 26, 2015
When instantiating a series with a datetimeindex but no data value (=None), a very slow codepath is used (involving Timestamp creation), compared to if a NaN value is supplied. The results are identical.
pandas version 0.17.0