Indexing into Series of tz-aware datetime64s fails using __getitem__

[JackKelly]

I'm a huge fan of Pandas. Thanks for all the hard work!

I believe I have stumbled across a small bug in Pandas 0.17.1 which was not present in 0.16.2. Indexing into Series of timezone-aware datetime64s fails using __getitem__ but indexing succeeds if the datetime64s are timezone-naive. Here is a minimal code example and the exception produced by Pandas 0.17.1:

In [37]: dates_with_tz = pd.date_range("2011-01-01", periods=3, tz="US/Eastern")

In [46]: dates_with_tz
Out[46]: 
DatetimeIndex(['2011-01-01 00:00:00-05:00', '2011-01-02 00:00:00-05:00',
               '2011-01-03 00:00:00-05:00'],
              dtype='datetime64[ns, US/Eastern]', freq='D')

In [38]: s_with_tz = pd.Series(dates_with_tz, index=['a', 'b', 'c'])

In [39]: s_with_tz
Out[39]: 
a   2011-01-01 00:00:00-05:00
b   2011-01-02 00:00:00-05:00
c   2011-01-03 00:00:00-05:00
dtype: datetime64[ns, US/Eastern]

In [40]: s_with_tz['a']
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IndexError                                Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-40-81d0bf655282> in <module>()
----> 1 s_with_tz['a']

/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/core/series.pyc in __getitem__(self, key)
    555     def __getitem__(self, key):
    556         try:
--> 557             result = self.index.get_value(self, key)
    558 
    559             if not np.isscalar(result):

/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/core/index.pyc in get_value(self, series, key)
   1778         s = getattr(series,'_values',None)
   1779         if isinstance(s, Index) and lib.isscalar(key):
-> 1780             return s[key]
   1781 
   1782         s = _values_from_object(series)

/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pandas/tseries/base.pyc in __getitem__(self, key)
     98         getitem = self._data.__getitem__
     99         if np.isscalar(key):
--> 100             val = getitem(key)
    101             return self._box_func(val)
    102         else:

IndexError: only integers, slices (`:`), ellipsis (`...`), numpy.newaxis (`None`) and integer or boolean arrays are valid indices

If the dates are timezone-aware then we can access them using loc but, as far as I'm aware, we should be able to use __getitem__ in this situation too:

In [41]: s_with_tz.loc['a']
Out[41]: Timestamp('2011-01-01 00:00:00-0500', tz='US/Eastern')

However, if the dates are timezone-naive then indexing using __getitem__ works as expected:

In [32]: dates_naive = pd.date_range("2011-01-01", periods=3)

In [33]: dates_naive
Out[33]: DatetimeIndex(['2011-01-01', '2011-01-02', '2011-01-03'], dtype='datetime64[ns]', freq='D')

In [34]: s = pd.Series(dates_naive, index=['a', 'b', 'c'])

In [35]: s
Out[35]: 
a   2011-01-01
b   2011-01-02
c   2011-01-03
dtype: datetime64[ns]

In [36]: s['a']
Out[36]: Timestamp('2011-01-01 00:00:00')

So indexing into a Series using __getitem__ works if the data is a list of timezone-naive datetime64s but indexing fails if the datetime64s are timezone-aware.

In [47]: pd.show_versions()

INSTALLED VERSIONS
------------------
commit: None
python: 2.7.10.final.0
python-bits: 64
OS: Linux
OS-release: 4.2.0-23-generic
machine: x86_64
processor: x86_64
byteorder: little
LC_ALL: None
LANG: en_GB.UTF-8

pandas: 0.17.1
nose: 1.3.7
pip: 1.5.6
setuptools: 15.2
Cython: 0.23.1
numpy: 1.10.1
scipy: 0.16.1
statsmodels: 0.6.1
IPython: 4.0.0
sphinx: 1.2.3
patsy: 0.3.0
dateutil: 2.4.2
pytz: 2015.7
blosc: None
bottleneck: None
tables: 3.2.2
numexpr: 2.4.6
matplotlib: 1.4.3
openpyxl: None
xlrd: 0.9.2
xlwt: None
xlsxwriter: None
lxml: None
bs4: 4.3.2
html5lib: 0.999
httplib2: 0.9
apiclient: None
sqlalchemy: None
pymysql: None
psycopg2: 2.5.3 (dt dec pq3 ext)
Jinja2: None

[jorisvandenbossche]

I can confirm this bug, also with current master.

[jreback]

just need a try: except: around line 1780 catching IndexError and passing if its caught.

@JackKelly want to do a PR?

[jreback]

tests can go in the same place as in #12054

[JackKelly]

sure, I'll give it a go now...

[JackKelly]

OK, I've attempted the fix. Here's the relevant commit on my fork of Pandas.

However, this hasn't fixed the issue and I'm not sure what's best to do. My 'fix' has revealed a new issue. The problem appears to be that, now, when we do series['a'], we get back a tz-naive Timestamp (even though the series contains a bunch of tz-aware datetime64s):

In [5]: dates = pd.date_range("2011-01-01", periods=3, tz='utc')

In [6]: dates
Out[6]: DatetimeIndex(['2011-01-01', '2011-01-02', '2011-01-03'], dtype='datetime64[ns, UTC]', freq='D')

In [7]: series = pd.Series(dates, index=['a', 'b', 'c'])

# Note the lack of timezone:
In [8]: series['a']
Out[8]: Timestamp('2011-01-01 00:00:00')

# But using `loc` we do get the timezone:
In [9]: series.loc['a']
Out[9]: Timestamp('2011-01-01 00:00:00+0000', tz='UTC')

In [10]: series
Out[10]: 
a   2011-01-01 00:00:00+00:00
b   2011-01-02 00:00:00+00:00
c   2011-01-03 00:00:00+00:00
dtype: datetime64[ns, UTC]

In [11]: series['a'] == series.loc['a']
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError                                 Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-11-0de902e8919c> in <module>()
----> 1 series['a'] == series.loc['a']

/home/jack/workspace/python/pandas/pandas/tslib.pyx in pandas.tslib._Timestamp.__richcmp__ (pandas/tslib.c:19258)()
    971                                 (type(self).__name__, type(other).__name__))
    972 
--> 973         self._assert_tzawareness_compat(other)
    974         return _cmp_scalar(self.value, ots.value, op)
    975 

/home/jack/workspace/python/pandas/pandas/tslib.pyx in pandas.tslib._Timestamp._assert_tzawareness_compat (pandas/tslib.c:19638)()
   1000         if self.tzinfo is None:
   1001             if other.tzinfo is not None:
-> 1002                 raise TypeError('Cannot compare tz-naive and tz-aware '
   1003                                  'timestamps')
   1004         elif other.tzinfo is None:

TypeError: Cannot compare tz-naive and tz-aware timestamps

[jreback]

yeh, prob some issues down the path. lmk if you get stuck.

[JackKelly]

Hmm, I think this is way over my head to be honest. I'm really not very familiar with Pandas' internals. I have had a quick shot at getting to the bottom of it. Not sure if I've found any bugs or not. Here are my notes:

Set up a debugging session in IPython like this:

dates_with_tz = pd.date_range("2011-01-01", periods=3, tz="US/Eastern")
s_with_tz = pd.Series(dates_with_tz, index=['a', 'b', 'c'])
%debug s_with_tz['a']

we find that:

In Index.get_value(), the line s = _values_from_object(series) sets s to be:

['2011-01-01T05:00:00.000000000+0000' '2011-01-02T05:00:00.000000000+0000'
 '2011-01-03T05:00:00.000000000+0000']

i.e. timezone is switched from "US/Eastern" to UTC. I've tried stepping into _values_from_object(series) to find where the timezone is switched but I'm not sure I understand what I'm looking at. My only hunch is that the following is broken (because the timezone should still be US/Eastern, surely?):

In [32]: s_with_tz._values._values
Out[32]: 
array(['2011-01-01T05:00:00.000000000+0000',
       '2011-01-02T05:00:00.000000000+0000',
       '2011-01-03T05:00:00.000000000+0000'], dtype='datetime64[ns]')

but I'm really not sure! Is s_with_tz._values._values supposed to return an array where the timezone is set to UTC instead of 'US/Eastern'? Here are the other values (which look correct to me):

In [33]: s_with_tz._values
Out[33]: 
DatetimeIndex(['2011-01-01 00:00:00-05:00', '2011-01-02 00:00:00-05:00',
               '2011-01-03 00:00:00-05:00'],
              dtype='datetime64[ns, US/Eastern]', freq='D')

In [34]: s_with_tz
Out[34]: 
a   2011-01-01 00:00:00-05:00
b   2011-01-02 00:00:00-05:00
c   2011-01-03 00:00:00-05:00
dtype: datetime64[ns, US/Eastern]

[JackKelly]

thank you @jreback :)