Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
BUG: Period ops with np.timedelta64 cause unexpected result #7740
Comments
|
Related to #5202. |
jreback
added Bug Timedelta Period
labels
Jul 14, 2014
jreback
added this to the
0.15.0
milestone
Jul 14, 2014
sinhrks
referenced
this issue
Aug 8, 2014
Merged
ENH/BUG: Period and PeriodIndex ops supports timedelta-like #7966
jreback
closed this
in #7966
Aug 10, 2014
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
sinhrks commentedJul 12, 2014
Period+np.timedelta64doesn't raiseTypeError(NotImplemented)(likeoffsetsdoes), and results in erratic internal representation.PeriodIndex+np.timedelta64also doesn't raiseTypeError(NotImplemented), and are added ignoringPeriodIndex.freq.