Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
ENH/BUG: DatetimeIndex and PeriodIndex in-place ops behaves incorrectly #7741
Conversation
sinhrks
referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2014
Open
INT: mixin for PeriodIndex / Datetimeindex for common methods #6469
sinhrks
changed the title from
ENH: PeriodIndex ops can accept Index to ENH/BUG: DatetimeIndex and PeriodIndex in-place ops behaves incorrectly
Jul 13, 2014
jreback
added API Design Period
labels
Jul 14, 2014
jreback
modified the milestone: 0.15.1, 0.15.0
Jul 14, 2014
sinhrks
referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2014
Closed
BUG: combine_first behaves strangely with period index #3367
|
This can solve #3367. Test cases are added. |
jreback
and 1 other
commented on an outdated diff
Jul 19, 2014
| @@ -729,6 +825,86 @@ def test_representation(self): | ||
| result = getattr(idx, func)() | ||
| self.assertEqual(result, expected) | ||
| + def test_add_iadd(self): | ||
| + # union |
jreback
Contributor
|
|
look good..thanks |
jreback
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 23, 2014
|
|
jreback |
492605e
|
jreback
merged commit 492605e
into pandas-dev:master
Jul 23, 2014
1 check passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci
The Travis CI build passed
Details
sinhrks
deleted the
sinhrks:period_ops branch
Jul 25, 2014
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
sinhrks commentedJul 13, 2014
Fixes 2 issues related to
DetetimeIndexandPeriodIndexops.PeriodIndexraiseTypeError(Closes #3367).PeriodIndexin-place operation results inInt64Index(Closes #6527)