Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[gcs] map tiles mixed up #1747

Closed
bartslinger opened this issue Jun 19, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

[gcs] map tiles mixed up #1747

bartslinger opened this issue Jun 19, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@bartslinger
Copy link
Contributor

From the menu in the GCS, I selected Maps->Dump map of Tiles. The generated *.png already shows the tiles mixed up, and that's also how they appear in the GCS if I load the file. Tried both google and bing as map source, but that did not solve the problem.
screenshot from 2016-06-19 10 02 21

@flixr flixr added the GCS label Jun 19, 2016
@OpenUAS OpenUAS self-assigned this Feb 14, 2017
@OpenUAS
Copy link
Contributor

OpenUAS commented Feb 14, 2017

Will test and see to reproduce asap

@OpenUAS OpenUAS added the Minor label Feb 14, 2017
@gautierhattenberger
Copy link
Member

did anyone managed to reproduce this bug ?

@podhrmic
Copy link
Member

Yes, this is what it looks like on Ubuntu 16.04 and master pprz.

First, this is the GCS view with a rectangle select for the tile dump:
gcs

This is the resulting tile dump file:
tiles

Obviously wrong. On the other side, I didn't know about that feature (Dump Tiles) until I read this issue, so perhaps it can be removed if it is too hard to fix?

@OpenUAS
Copy link
Contributor

OpenUAS commented Aug 3, 2017

I yes, could reproduce, on latest, de feature is uest and looking at it maybe has to do with wrong tile zoomlevel, recal that changed to higher in the past, but maybe not this part.

@gautierhattenberger
Copy link
Member

closing as won't be fixed in current GCS
see https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi/projects/2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants