Use RuboCop::Packaging amongst other extensions #1282
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
And also fix the offenses shown by the respective cops. The docs can be found here: https://docs.rubocop.org/rubocop-packaging/cops_packaging.html Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Gupta <utkarsh@debian.org>
utkarsh2102
force-pushed
the
use-rubocop-packaging
branch
from
e77a8b9
to
a2bc1b6
Compare
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
Thanks for your work on this so far! ❤️
This PR adds another known extension of RuboCop -- RuboCop::Packaging.
Packaging style guide can be found here: https://packaging.rubystyle.guide/
And the docs can be found here: https://docs.rubocop.org/rubocop-packaging/
Should you have any questions, please let me know!
Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Gupta <utkarsh@debian.org>