aiseo

Agent-first CLI for SEO, GEO (generative engine optimisation), and AEO (answer engine optimisation) audits.

Built on agent-cli-framework. The binary is the interface: every command emits a JSON envelope when piped, coloured human output in a terminal, and aiseo agent-info returns the full machine-readable capability manifest.

This CLI is designed for coding agents (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI) to use as a tool. Humans get a colour fallback, but the surface is shaped around what an agent needs to make decisions about a page.

Install

cargo install --path .

Then drop the wrapper skill into your AI agent platforms:

aiseo skill install

This writes a small SKILL.md into ~/.claude/skills/aiseo/, ~/.codex/skills/aiseo/, and ~/.gemini/skills/aiseo/. The skill itself is a one-screen pointer — the documentation lives inside the binary via aiseo agent-info.

Use

Four user commands:

aiseo audit page.html                       # full audit of a local file
aiseo audit page.html --fail-under 80       # CI gate: exit 1 if score < 80
aiseo audit page.html --out audit.html      # printable, reviewable report
aiseo audit page.html --out audit.sarif     # GitHub Code Scanning annotations
aiseo audit page.html --factors meta,og     # only show meta + OG suggestions

aiseo fetch https://example.com             # audit a live URL
aiseo fetch https://example.com --fail-under 75 --out audit.sarif

aiseo verify before.json page.html          # re-audit + diff; exit 1 if regression
                                            # or any previous suggestion still present

aiseo schema faq --qa 'What is GEO?::Generative Engine Optimisation.'
aiseo schema article --title '...' --description '...' --date-published 2026-05-24 --author 'Dr Jane Smith' --credentials MD
aiseo schema howto --name 'Lower LDL' --step 'See your GP' --step 'Start a statin'
aiseo schema organization --name '199 Bio' --url https://199.bio
aiseo schema person --name 'Boris Djordjevic' --job-title 'Founder'

aiseo agent-info                            # full machine-readable manifest
aiseo skill install                         # drop a tiny SKILL.md into ~/.claude/skills/aiseo/

Compose with anything that emits HTML or Markdown

aiseo audit - reads from stdin. HTML vs Markdown is sniffed from the first non-whitespace character. Lets the CLI plug into any extraction tool without growing its own crawler:

# Plain curl for static pages
curl -s https://example.com | aiseo audit -

# Via the `search` CLI for JS-heavy or anti-bot pages (firecrawl, stealth, browserless)
search search -q https://js-heavy.com -m scrape --json | jq -r '.results[0].snippet' | aiseo audit -

# Pre-deploy: pipe a built page through aiseo as part of the build
cat dist/blog/post.html | aiseo audit - --fail-under 80

Markup-only signals (meta tags, OG, schema, freshness) require raw HTML — most extraction tools strip these, so the markup half of the audit will come back empty. Content signals (keywords, entities, voice, position-bias) work on either.

What audit returns

A single typed JSON envelope. Agents read sub-objects directly; humans read the suggestion list.

• meta — <title>, description, keywords, author, canonical
• open_graph, twitter_card — social preview surfaces
• schema_types — every @type found in JSON-LD blocks (e.g. ["Article", "FAQPage"])
• content — H1/H2/H3 lists, word count, presence flags
• keywords — { primary[], questions[], density{} }
• entities — { people[{name, credentials?}], organizations[] }
• evidence — { stat_count, quote_count, unsupported_claims[] }
• voice — { featured_snippet_candidate, speakable_eligible, avg_sentence_words }
• ai_slop — { signals[], density_per_1000_words, verdict }. Regex-only LLM-writing detector (negation pivots, delve family, tapestry cluster, false-conclusion openers, bold-colon headers, etc.). Em-dashes deliberately NOT flagged — broken signal in 2026 and Boris-style British English uses them. verdict is clean | suspicious | likely_ai by confidence-weighted density per 1000 words.
• information_gain — { score: 0..10, counts, samples[] }. Google's March-2026 Core Update made Information Gain a dominant content-quality signal. Counts named-source quotes, sample-size disclosures (n=…), year-over-year deltas, first-person evidence (we analysed…), methodology disclosure, numbered citations. Below 5 starts deducting from the score; below 2 hits hard.
• metatext — { signals[], heading_skeleton: { jaccard, matched[] }, weighted_score_per_1000_words, verdict }. Catches the agent-speaking-instead-of-content class of slop the lexical detector misses: process narration ("I'll start by…"), self-identification ("As an AI…"), closing pleasantries ("Hope this helps"), bracket asides, markdown envelopes, hedge stacks, sycophancy ("Great question!"). Plus a novel heading-skeleton Jaccard detector — flags pages whose outline matches the canonical AI table-of-contents (Introduction / Background / Key Features / FAQ / Conclusion). Position-weighted: openers in the first 15% and pleasantries in the last 20% weigh more.
• copy_precision — { score: 0..10, counts, densities, verdict }. Positive score. Velvet-glove discipline: rewards tight prose, penalises filler words (very, really, actually), -ly adverbs, hedged modals, empty-emphasis adjectives (crucial, key, vital), throat-clearing openers, low sentence-length variance, long Latinate words, absent concrete nouns. Verdicts tight (≥8), mid (5..7), padded (<5).
• design_slop — { findings[], counts, verdict }. Visual / typographic / colour tells of AI-generated UIs in 2026. Catches the indigo-CTA cluster, gradient text, the AI purple/violet palette, cubic-bezier overshoot bouncing, monotonous spacing, everything-centered, single-font pages, the overused-font list (Inter, Geist, Fraunces, Plus Jakarta Sans, etc.), shadcn's unmodified :root palette, next-forge defaults, and the 2026 Claude/Anthropic Fraunces + warm-brown italic wave. Pattern bank ported from Paul Bakaus's pbakaus/impeccable (Apache-2.0) — see NOTICE.
• position_bias — word-offset percentages of TL;DR / first stat / first credential, with warnings when high-leverage signals sit past the first 30% of the page
• freshness — dateModified, datePublished, days since last modification, year mentions
• score — rough 0–100, weighted toward AI-citation surface
• score_breakdown — per-component deductions: { name, deducted, reason }[]
• suggestions — flat list of concrete next actions

Output formats

--out extension	What you get	Use case
.json	Pretty JSON envelope	Programmatic, default
.html	Self-contained printable report, serif typography, no JS, no CDN	Share with a client, print, attach to a PR
.sarif	SARIF 2.1.0	GitHub Code Scanning annotations

Closing the loop with verify

LLMs and coding agents often claim work they did not finish. verify is the gate:

aiseo audit page.html --out before.json
# ...agent edits page.html...
aiseo verify before.json page.html

Returns a typed diff:

{
  "previous": { "score": 60 },
  "current":  { "score": 92 },
  "delta": {
    "score_change": 32,
    "fixed":         ["og:title absent.", "dateModified absent. ..."],
    "regressed":     [],
    "still_present": []
  },
  "verdict": "pass"
}

Exit code is 1 if anything is still present or a new suggestion regressed. The audit data is on stdout regardless — the gate only flips the exit code.

Why this exists

The Python skill at claude-skill-seo-geo-optimizer was a 13-script bundle stitched together with regex and urllib. It worked, but the install footprint was big, the parsing was brittle, and it was ergonomically wrong for an agent: too many subcommands, too much documentation in the skill file, and no way to call it without Python on the box.

aiseo collapses the same surface into a single binary, parses HTML with scraper instead of regex, returns honest typed JSON, and ships zero documentation in the skill — the binary describes itself.

Research basis (May 2026)

The audit's heuristics are grounded in the post-Gemini-3 AI search landscape:

• Position bias — first ~30% of a page captures ~44% of AI-search citations (iPullRank, AIBoost 2026).
• Schema — useful for entity clarity and rich results, but only ~+2.4% AI Mode citation lift in the Ahrefs 1,885-page test. Don't oversell it.
• Freshness — Perplexity and the post-Gemini-3 AI Overviews both lift recently-modified content.
• Named credentials and primary-source citations — held up in the AgenticGEO and Citation Selection vs Absorption studies (2026).
• FAQ rich results — retired by Google on 7 May 2026, but FAQ schema still matters for Bing, Brave, DuckDuckGo, and as a structural signal for AI platforms.

Exit codes

• 0 — success
• 1 — transient (IO / network) — retry
• 2 — config error — fix setup
• 3 — bad input — fix arguments
• 4 — rate limited — wait and retry

Licence

MIT. © Boris Djordjevic, 199 Biotechnologies.