Update revisionDesc

 - Submit - Originally submitted to litpap.info 2018.07.24 by Marco Perale. Submission has been transferred to papyri.info. Submission notes were: “Entering past and ongoing work on hexameter adespota. Text after editio princeps (= ZPE, same as P.Köln I 6). I have added editors' supplements in Commentary section. Moved and changed ‘Display Name’; added script type in physical description and notes; added measurements; change link to image; added bibliography; please consider deleting ‘lyric’ in keywords: this is hexametric.“ (James Cowey)
 - Vote - ReturnToSender - Generally fine, but some changes needed. Text: replace all lunate sigmas and encode sublinear dots properly (esp. ll. 5, 7-10). In l.5, eta was suggested by the ed.pr., but based on the digital image, it seems the least likely possibility to me, even though (as the editors note) a long is required. I recommend printing the reading of the ed.pr., (a dotted letter) and noting the possibilities in a comment. Meta: limit the page number for 78648 to p.25, on which this papyrus is discussed. (C. Michael Sampson)
 - Vote - Accept-Straight-to-Finalization - See Sampson's comments.  In line 5 and 9, close [.?] within the lacuna. l. 5, eta seems fine--add (?) to signal uncertainty? (Rodney Ast)
 - Finalized - Ready (Rodney Ast)

DCLP/64/63260.xml

@@ -105,6 +105,12 @@
          </langUsage>
       </profileDesc>
       <revisionDesc>
+         <change when="2020-04-06T14:30:22-04:00" who="http://papyri.info/users/simoeis">Finalized - Ready</change>
+         <change when="2020-04-06T14:18:00-04:00" who="http://papyri.info/users/simoeis">Vote - Accept-Straight-to-Finalization - See Sampson's comments.  In line 5 and 9, close [.?] within the lacuna. l. 5, eta seems fine--add (?) to signal uncertainty?</change>
+         <change when="2019-08-17T17:12:35-04:00"
+                 who="http://papyri.info/users/Mike%20Sampson">Vote - ReturnToSender - Generally fine, but some changes needed. Text: replace all lunate sigmas and encode sublinear dots properly (esp. ll. 5, 7-10). In l.5, eta was suggested by the ed.pr., but based on the digital image, it seems the least likely possibility to me, even though (as the editors note) a long is required. I recommend printing the reading of the ed.pr., (a dotted letter) and noting the possibilities in a comment. Meta: limit the page number for 78648 to p.25, on which this papyrus is discussed.</change>
+         <change when="2019-08-16T09:51:12-04:00"
+                 who="http://papyri.info/users/james.cowey">Submit - Originally submitted to litpap.info 2018.07.24 by Marco Perale. Submission has been transferred to papyri.info. Submission notes were: “Entering past and ongoing work on hexameter adespota. Text after editio princeps (= ZPE, same as P.Köln I 6). I have added editors' supplements in Commentary section. Moved and changed ‘Display Name’; added script type in physical description and notes; added measurements; change link to image; added bibliography; please consider deleting ‘lyric’ in keywords: this is hexametric.“</change>
          <change when="2014-12-10" who="DCLP">Crosswalked to EpiDoc XML</change>
       </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>