How does this compare to `arrayvec`'s `ArrayString`?

[ErichDonGubler]

No description provided.

[paulocsanz]

Our API is more extensible, it allows for unchecked write, truncating write, it never panicks in release builds.

There is no_std, serde and diesel integration where arrayvec has no_std and serde erroring (we truncate if the string is bigger, but this is debatable - we could make a Truncate newtype that truncates by default while the regular integration returns a error, or something like that).

Our approach to generics is a bit different, and we support any size from 1 byte to 255 bytes.

I've also benchmarked and this is the comparison (check the benches folder to analyze the micro benchmark). It's basically the same, but our implementation seems a bit faster (but it could be noise).

small-string  (23 bytes)      clone                  4.837 ns
small-string  (23 bytes)      try_from_str          13.552 ns
small-string  (23 bytes)      from_str_truncate     11.360 ns
small-string  (23 bytes)      from_str_unchecked    11.291 ns
small-string  (23 bytes)      try_push_str           1.162 ns
small-string  (23 bytes)      push_str               3.490 ns
small-string  (23 bytes)      push_str_unchecked     1.098 ns
-------------------------------------------------------------
arrayvec string (21 bytes)    clone                  7.725 ns
arrayvec string (21 bytes)    from                  14.794 ns
arrayvec string (21 bytes)    push str               1.363 ns