New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pattern/get-contributions-despite-silo-thinking #38

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@gruetter
Collaborator

gruetter commented Feb 8, 2017

In hierarchical and silo-organized organizations, getting voluntary contributions in InnerSource projects can be challenging. It is crucial to create mechanisms to incentivize managers to foster voluntary contributions.

Hey everyone. Here's a new donut from the Bosch guys. Have at it ;)

nyeates added some commits Feb 16, 2017

clarified problem and added solution
Clarified problem statement, added new possible solution (used at Red
Hat)
Renamed file to be consistent
Removed “donut” from front of file name to be consistent with file
names in root directory
@nyeates

Approved after editing formatting/grammar and adding an additional solution

@nyeates nyeates changed the title from Feature/donut get contributions despite silo thinking to pattern/get-contributions-despite-silo-thinking Feb 21, 2017

@dmittman

This comment has been minimized.

dmittman commented Oct 15, 2017

First time commenter on these patterns. I've observed that although the title of this pattern seems to be "Incentive mechanisms to foster voluntary contribution" (differs from the filename, but that's a different matter), the gist of the pattern seems to be finding ways to recast the contribution effort as something other than voluntary. That is, not that the contribution is "compulsory," but that the contribution is a part of the InnerSource participant's compensation. I've done some thinking about the differences between Open Source volunteerism (where an individual is contributing to an Open Source project on their own, uncompensated time), versus InnerSource where, as an employee of a company, labor laws often prohibit you from "volunteering" your time. Is there a way to remove the word "volunteer" from InnerSource? I believe that the idea that we're "volunteering" on an InnerSource project is what sets some project managers against the idea of InnerSource.

@rrrutledge

This comment has been minimized.

Collaborator

rrrutledge commented Oct 18, 2017

Thanks for commenting, @dmittman . I like that point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment