Descriptive mAchine Learning EXplanations
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Clone or download
pbiecek Merge pull request #47 from 12tafran/develop
Adding plot functionality to model_performance #34
Latest commit c74aa77 Oct 7, 2018

README.md

DALEX

CRAN_Status_Badge Downloads Total Downloads Build Status Coverage Status

DALEX: Descriptive mAchine Learning EXplanations

Machine Learning models are widely used and have various applications in classification or regression tasks. Due to increasing computational power, availability of new data sources and new methods, ML models are more and more complex. Models created with techniques like boosting, bagging of neural networks are true black boxes. It is hard to trace the link between input variables and model outcomes. They are use because of high performance, but lack of interpretability is one of their weakest sides.

In many applications we need to know, understand or prove how input variables are used in the model and what impact do they have on final model prediction. DALEX is a set of tools that help to understand how complex models are working.

Find more about DALEX in this Gentle introduction to DALEX with examples.

Experimental Python version pyDALEX.

DALEX Stories

How to use DALEX

Talks about DALEX

Install

From CRAN

install.packages("DALEX")

or from GitHub

# dependencies
devtools::install_github("MI2DataLab/factorMerger")
devtools::install_github("pbiecek/breakDown")

# DALEX package
devtools::install_github("pbiecek/DALEX")

Cheatsheets

DALEX_local

Roadmap

DALEX_intro

Single Variable

DALEX_single_variable

Single Prediction

DALEX_single_prediction

Variable Drop-out / Importance

DALEX_variable_dropout

Why

76 years ago Isaac Asimov devised Three Laws of Robotics: 1) a robot may not injure a human being, 2) a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings and 3) A robot must protect its own existence. These laws impact discussion around Ethics of AI. Today’s robots, like cleaning robots, robotic pets or autonomous cars are far from being conscious enough to be under Asimov’s ethics.

Today we are surrounded by complex predictive algorithms used for decision making. Machine learning models are used in health care, politics, education, judiciary and many other areas. Black box predictive models have far larger influence on our lives than physical robots. Yet, applications of such models are left unregulated despite many examples of their potential harmfulness. See Weapons of Math Destruction by Cathy O'Neil for an excellent overview of potential problems.

It's clear that we need to control algorithms that may affect us. Such control is in our civic rights. Here we propose three requirements that any predictive model should fulfill.

  • Prediction's justifications. For every prediction of a model one should be able to understand which variables affect the prediction and how strongly. Variable attribution to final prediction.
  • Prediction's speculations. For every prediction of a model one should be able to understand how the model prediction would change if input variables were changed. Hypothesizing about what-if scenarios.
  • Prediction's validations For every prediction of a model one should be able to verify how strong are evidences that confirm this particular prediction.

There are two ways to comply with these requirements. One is to use only models that fulfill these conditions by design. White-box models like linear regression or decision trees. In many cases the price for transparency is lower performance. The other way is to use approximated explainers – techniques that find only approximated answers, but work for any black box model. Here we present such techniques.

Acknowledgments

Work on this package was financially supported by the 'NCN Opus grant 2016/21/B/ST6/02176'.