Skip to content

/ archivist

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

createLocalRepo in an existing archivist repo #318

Closed
wiedemak opened this issue Nov 7, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

createLocalRepo in an existing archivist repo #318

wiedemak opened this issue Nov 7, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@pbiecek
Labels
bug enhancement needs fast fix

Comments

@wiedemak
Copy link

@wiedemak wiedemak commented Nov 7, 2017

Is there any reason why createLocalRepo(R) does not check for an existing archivist repository?
If it is done twice for some reason, backpack.db is reinitalized and summary/showLocalRepo() return the repository is emtpy. The *.rda files still exist but can't be loaded anymore.
@pbiecek
Copy link
Owner

@pbiecek pbiecek commented Nov 7, 2017

Thanks, this should be checked.
Will be fixed
@pbiecek pbiecek self-assigned this Nov 24, 2017
@pbiecek pbiecek mentioned this issue Nov 24, 2017
Closed
pbiecek added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 24, 2017
@pbiecek
fix for #318 and changes consistent with #319
Loading status checks…
03323a9
@pbiecek
Copy link
Owner

@pbiecek pbiecek commented Nov 24, 2017

fixed with 03323a9
@pbiecek pbiecek closed this Nov 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@pbiecek pbiecek

Labels
bug enhancement needs fast fix
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
@pbiecek @wiedemak
You can’t perform that action at this time.