Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify requirement for AP in annotation dictionaries #22

Closed
MPBailey opened this issue Jan 14, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Clarify requirement for AP in annotation dictionaries #22

MPBailey opened this issue Jan 14, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
ISO approved Resolved issue approved by ISO

Comments

@MPBailey
Copy link
Collaborator

The Value cell for AP in table 166 explicitly says "(Optional; PDF 1.2)", but then goes on to say that "Every annotation [...], except for the two cases listed below, shall have at least one appearance dictionary."

I recommend changing the initial parenthetical text to something that make people realise that AP is not simply optional and that they need to read the full text; perhaps "(Usually required; PDF 1.2)".

@MPBailey MPBailey added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 14, 2021
@petervwyatt petervwyatt added the proposed solution Proposed solution is ready for review label Jan 19, 2021
@petervwyatt
Copy link
Member

PDF TWG request wording change to: "(Required except for conditions listed below...)"

(PDF TWG would like more specific information instead of just "usually"...)

@petervwyatt petervwyatt added ISO submitted Resolved issue submitted to ISO for approval and removed bug Something isn't working proposed solution Proposed solution is ready for review labels Dec 6, 2021
@petervwyatt petervwyatt added this to the ISO Submission Feb 2022 milestone Dec 6, 2021
@petervwyatt petervwyatt added ISO approved Resolved issue approved by ISO and removed ISO submitted Resolved issue submitted to ISO for approval labels Apr 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ISO approved Resolved issue approved by ISO
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants