Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: upgrade runners ubuntu-2004 -> ubuntu-2204 #3510

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2023
Merged

Conversation

conorsch
Copy link
Contributor

We were building binaries on Ubuntu 20.04, which made using those binaries on newer platforms (e.g. Debian Stable 12 Bookworm) throw ssl shared object errors. A few folks reported this problem in Discord. Building on the new runners resolves this problem, at least for Debian Stable. I haven't done a full matrix of platform compatibility, nor do I plan to: listening to reports in Discord is data enough for now.

Also bumps cargo-dist 0.4.2 -> 0.5.0.
Trying to stay on top of cargo-dist version changes, so we don't get surprised by a large diff. Already tested this version in a private fork and it worked great.

We were building binaries on Ubuntu 20.04, which made using those
binaries on newer platforms (e.g. Debian Stable 12 Bookworm) throw ssl
shared object errors. A few folks reported this problem in Discord.
Building on the new runners resolves this problem, at least for Debian
Stable. I haven't done a full matrix of platform compatibility, nor do I
plan to: listening to reports in Discord is data enough for now.

Also bumps cargo-dist 0.4.2 -> 0.5.0.
Trying to stay on top of cargo-dist version changes, so we don't get
surprised by a large diff. Already tested this version in a private fork
and it worked great.
@conorsch conorsch merged commit 3f08cc4 into main Dec 12, 2023
7 checks passed
@conorsch conorsch deleted the ubuntu-2204-runners branch December 12, 2023 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant