Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

staking: move uptime tracking to NV storage #4046

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

erwanor
Copy link
Member

@erwanor erwanor commented Mar 18, 2024

Close #4030, I think we could also avoid deserializing into a domain type altogether, maybe other optimizations are possible. This takes care of the state-breaking part of the change.

@erwanor erwanor added A-staking Area: Design and implementation of staking and delegation consensus-breaking breaking change to execution of on-chain data state-breaking breaking change to on-chain data labels Mar 18, 2024
@erwanor erwanor requested review from hdevalence and cratelyn March 18, 2024 21:48
@cratelyn cratelyn added this to the Sprint 2 milestone Mar 19, 2024
@cratelyn
Copy link
Contributor

i would be curious to learn more about the design considerations of non-verifiable storage, and what we do/don't use it for. that's a conversation probably better redirected towards discord though.

in any case, this looks like a great PR. nice work @erwanor!

@erwanor erwanor merged commit 70a3ed2 into main Mar 20, 2024
6 checks passed
@erwanor erwanor deleted the erwan/4030_nv_tracking branch March 20, 2024 00:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-staking Area: Design and implementation of staking and delegation consensus-breaking breaking change to execution of on-chain data state-breaking breaking change to on-chain data
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

staking: move uptime tracking to nonverifiable storage
2 participants