backports point-release support for solo node #4556
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The solo node, run outside the cluster, was being fully reset on point releases, due to the aggressive reset logic that was written during the days of frequent chain resets. We're performing point-releases more regularly now, so let's make sure to avoid resetting the solo node in those cases. Still unsupported is chain-migration logic specifically for the solo node, but that's fine: we're handling chain upgrades out of band for now anyway. Closes #4459. (cherry picked from commit 0b02ec3)
cronokirby
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes
Backports PR #4551 for 0.77.2 (#4545).
Issue ticket number and link
Checklist before requesting a review
If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: