fix: pd testnet join file archive support #4609
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Follow-up to #4607. This fix is required to preserve the original downloading from URL behavior. Both file:// and https:// URLs must remain supported. Must have accidentally rebased this diff out while collborating on 4607.
conorsch
force-pushed
the
fix-pd-join-archive
branch
from
c6ebcd1 to
a9cf484
Compare
zbuc
approved these changes
Jun 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes
Follow-up to #4607. This fix is required to preserve the original downloading from URL behavior. Both file:// and https:// URLs must remain supported. Must have accidentally rebased this diff out while collborating on 4607.
Issue ticket number and link
Checklist before requesting a review
If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason: