Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ci: add workflow_call to code analysis workflows #663

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024
Merged

ci: add workflow_call to code analysis workflows #663

merged 9 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

juarezr
Copy link
Member

@juarezr juarezr commented Mar 14, 2024

This PR has the objective of .

Changes

  1. add workflow_call to code analysis workflows

Checklist

Use this checklist to ensure the quality of pull requests that include new code and/or make changes to existing code.

  • Source Code guidelines:
    • Includes unit tests
    • New functions have docstrings with examples that can be run with doctest
    • New functions are included in API docs
    • Docstrings include notes for any changes to API or behavior
    • All changes are documented in docs/changes.rst
  • Versioning and history tracking guidelines:
    • Using atomic commits whenever possible
    • Commits are reversible whenever possible
    • There are no incomplete changes in the pull request
    • There is no accidental garbage added to the source code
  • Testing guidelines:
    • Tested locally using tox / pytest
    • Rebased to master branch and tested before sending the PR
    • Automated testing passes (see CI)
    • Unit test coverage has not decreased (see Coveralls)
  • State of these changes is:
    • Just a proof of concept
    • Work in progress / Further changes needed
    • Ready to review
    • Ready to merge

@juarezr juarezr added the Build CI CD Issues affecting github pypi readthedocs coveralls conda-forge label Mar 14, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 14, 2024 •
edited

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8288710487

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 91.072%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8287971511: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 13352
Relevant Lines: 14661
💛 - Coveralls

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

6 similar comments
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Mar 14, 2024
View reviewed changes
.github/workflows/test-changes.yml Outdated
call-workflow-codeql:
needs: test-source-code
uses: ./.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml
permissions:

Check notice

Code scanning / Checkov (reported by Codacy)

Ensure top-level permissions are not set to write-all

Ensure top-level permissions are not set to write-all
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Mar 14, 2024
View reviewed changes
examples/notes/issue_219.py Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
examples/notes/issue_219.py

# <codecell>
print(petl.VERSION)

Check warning

Code scanning / Pylintpython3 (reported by Codacy)

Module 'petl' has no 'VERSION' member Warning

Module 'petl' has no 'VERSION' member
examples/notes/issue_219.py

# <codecell>

# memory usage with server-side cursor
print etl.fromdb(lambda: mysql_connection.cursor(MySQLdb.cursors.SSCursor), 'select * from issue_219 order by foo').look(2)
print(etl.fromdb(lambda: mysql_connection.cursor(MySQLdb.cursors.SSCursor), 'select * from issue_219 order by foo').look(2))

Check warning

Code scanning / Pylintpython3 (reported by Codacy)

Line too long (124/100) Warning

Line too long (124/100)
examples/notes/issue_219.py

# <codecell>
import petl
from petl.fluent import etl

Check warning

Code scanning / Pylintpython3 (reported by Codacy)

No name 'fluent' in module 'petl' Warning

No name 'fluent' in module 'petl'
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Mar 14, 2024
View reviewed changes
examples/notes/issue_219.py

# <codecell>
import petl
from petl.fluent import etl

Check warning

Code scanning / Pylint (reported by Codacy)

No name 'fluent' in module 'petl' Warning

No name 'fluent' in module 'petl'
examples/notes/issue_219.py

# <codecell>

# memory usage using server-side cursor
print etl.fromdb(lambda: psql_connection.cursor(name='server-side'), 'select * from issue_219 order by foo').look(2)
print(etl.fromdb(lambda: psql_connection.cursor(name='server-side'), 'select * from issue_219 order by foo').look(2))

Check warning

Code scanning / Pylint (reported by Codacy)

Line too long (117/100) Warning

Line too long (117/100)
examples/notes/issue_219.py

# <codecell>

# memory usage with server-side cursor
print etl.fromdb(lambda: mysql_connection.cursor(MySQLdb.cursors.SSCursor), 'select * from issue_219 order by foo').look(2)
print(etl.fromdb(lambda: mysql_connection.cursor(MySQLdb.cursors.SSCursor), 'select * from issue_219 order by foo').look(2))

Check warning

Code scanning / Pylint (reported by Codacy)

Line too long (124/100) Warning

Line too long (124/100)
examples/notes/issue_219.py

# <codecell>
print(petl.VERSION)

Check warning

Code scanning / Pylint (reported by Codacy)

Module 'petl' has no 'VERSION' member Warning

Module 'petl' has no 'VERSION' member
github-advanced-security[bot]
github-advanced-security bot found potential problems Mar 14, 2024
View reviewed changes
.github/workflows/test-changes.yml Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
@juarezr juarezr merged commit 3f79c64 into petl-developers:master Mar 14, 2024
39 checks passed
@juarezr juarezr deleted the ci/upgrade-workflows-v3 branch March 14, 2024 23:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Build CI CD Issues affecting github pypi readthedocs coveralls conda-forge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@juarezr @coveralls