Skip to content

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with
or
.
Download ZIP
Fetching contributors…

Cannot retrieve contributors at this time

30 lines (24 sloc) 1.601 kB
David Chappell [declares the REST vs WS-* war over][rest-vs-ws-war-is-over]
> To anybody who's paying attention and who's not a hopeless partisan,
> the war between REST and WS-* is over. The war ended in a truce
> rather than crushing victory for one side--it's Korea, not World War
> II. The now-obvious truth is that both technologies have value, and
> both will be used going forward.
In this conflict I am, undeniably, a REST partisan. I know this
colors my perceptions, but it is not obvious to me that the war is
over. It has become obvious, however, that WS-* will not prevail. I
have no doubt that many people who have invested a great deal of time
and thought into WS-* that it remains a viable technology, at least
for certain problems, but that does not mean it will. I think the
situations for which WS-* is the best available technology are
vanishingly rare, perhaps even nonexistent. As Mark Baker puts it in
his [response to Mr Chappell][crud-more-crud-crud]
> Perhaps David - or anybody else - could point me towards a data
> oriented application which can't fit (well) into such a model (not
> REST, just the uniform interface part).
I expect that when all is said and done WS-* will still be around.
But rather than as a vibrate technology platform, the way Mr Chappell
seems to anticipate, I think it will be around in a way far more like
the way Cobol is still around today.
[rest-vs-ws-war-is-over]: http://www.davidchappell.com/blog/2007/06/rest-vs-ws-war-is-over-if-you-want-it.html
[crud-more-crud-crud]: http://www.markbaker.ca/blog/2007/07/03/crud-more-crud-crud/
Jump to Line
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.