Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: In logical decoding the if the backend was requesting a reply we… #1467

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Aug 28, 2019

Conversation

@davecramer
Copy link
Member

@davecramer davecramer commented Apr 11, 2019

… did not honour

that request, readInternal loop now honours this request.

All Submissions:

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?

New Feature Submissions:

  1. Does your submission pass tests?
  2. Does mvn checkstyle:check pass ?

Changes to Existing Features:

  • Does this break existing behaviour? If so please explain.
  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
  • Have you successfully run tests with your changes locally?
@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Apr 11, 2019

Loading

@codecov-io
Copy link

@codecov-io codecov-io commented Apr 11, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1467 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 58.33%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1467      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     68.94%   68.93%   -0.01%     
  Complexity     3956     3956              
============================================
  Files           179      179              
  Lines         16491    16494       +3     
  Branches       2678     2683       +5     
============================================
+ Hits          11369    11370       +1     
+ Misses         3877     3875       -2     
- Partials       1245     1249       +4

Loading

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Aug 7, 2019

Loading

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Aug 7, 2019

Loading

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Aug 7, 2019

Loading

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Aug 7, 2019

Loading

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Aug 26, 2019

Loading

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Aug 27, 2019

Loading

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

@AppVeyorBot AppVeyorBot commented Aug 28, 2019

Loading

@davecramer davecramer merged commit f89e62c into pgjdbc:master Aug 28, 2019
1 of 2 checks passed
Loading
@davecramer davecramer deleted the replicationbug branch Aug 28, 2019
davecramer added a commit to davecramer/pgjdbc that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2021
pgjdbc#1467)

* Do not call processCopyResults in flush

* Use System.nanos() instead of currentTimeMillis()

* Added lock into processCopyResults 

* ignore concurrent requests to processCopyResults

* reset the processingCopyResults in a try-finally block
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants