docs: Fix typos #472
docs: Fix typos #472
Conversation
Believe it or not I think occurred was fixed once already ;) Dave Cramer On 28 December 2015 at 07:14, Philippe Marschall notifications@github.com
|
Can we add a checkstyle rule to catch those kind of things? |
@vlsi a rule for what? spell checking or just "occured"? |
Well, if you would be able to configure a spellchecker, that would be good. |
How do spell checkers work with variables ? Does it only check spelling in Dave Cramer On 28 December 2015 at 07:46, Vladimir Sitnikov notifications@github.com
|
It is somewhat hard to google for "spell checker for java sources". However the following might be feasible:
|
One problem with general spell checkers is that there are a lot of technical terms like "sql" in the source that are often not recognized. As for checkstyle the only option short of writing a custom module would be to use the Regexp module to search for known offenders. Let me know if I should do this. Anything more complex should IMO be moved to a different issue. One issue with just checking the Javadoc output is that about half the typos were in non-Javadoc comments. |
Ok, let's start with listing common offenders in checkstyle configuration. |
This is pretty low priority...IMHO Dave Cramer On 28 December 2015 at 08:32, Philippe Marschall notifications@github.com
|
Fix a few typos in the comments and add checkstyle rules for common offenders.
Fix a few typos in the comments.