Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add jdk9 Travis job #565

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

test: add jdk9 Travis job #565

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@vlsi
Copy link
Member

@vlsi vlsi commented May 14, 2016

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

@codecov-io codecov-io commented May 14, 2016

Current coverage is 70.50%

Merging #565 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%

  1. 4 files (not in diff) in ...va/org/postgresql/xa were modified. more
    • Misses +94
    • Hits -105
  2. 8 files (not in diff) in .../org/postgresql/util were modified. more
    • Misses +59
    • Hits -58
  3. 2 files (not in diff) in .../org/postgresql/sspi were modified. more
    • Misses -2
  4. 2 files (not in diff) in ...postgresql/ssl/jdbc4 were modified. more
    • Misses -12
    • Hits -2
  5. 3 files (not in diff) in ...a/org/postgresql/ssl were modified. more
    • Misses -13
  6. 2 files (not in diff) in .../org/postgresql/osgi were modified. more
    • Misses -1
    • Hits -4
  7. 17 files (not in diff) in .../org/postgresql/jdbc were modified. more
    • Misses +18
    • Hits +376
  8. 3 files (not in diff) in ...postgresql/geometric were modified. more
    • Misses +28
    • Hits -32
  9. 2 files (not in diff) in ...postgresql/ds/common were modified. more
    • Misses -1
    • Hits -6
  10. 2 files (not in diff) in ...va/org/postgresql/ds were modified. more
    • Misses -1
    • Hits -6
@@             master       #565   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           147        147          
  Lines         15505      15505          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches       3064       3064          
==========================================
+ Hits          10930      10932     +2   
+ Misses         4575       4573     -2   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last updated by 9f9aa95...a60b472

@vlsi vlsi force-pushed the vlsi:jdk9 branch 8 times, most recently from 1287d1c to 701c63e May 15, 2016
@davecramer
Copy link
Member

@davecramer davecramer commented May 15, 2016

it seems oraclejdk9 is not always available. Curious why the jdk8 one failed though ?

@vlsi vlsi force-pushed the vlsi:jdk9 branch from 701c63e to 81a75f8 May 15, 2016
@vlsi
Copy link
Member Author

@vlsi vlsi commented May 15, 2016

I just do multiple PRs in a single branch to shave time on Travis validation. It was "osgi test" part that failed. JDK9 seems to be doing fine.

@vlsi
Copy link
Member Author

@vlsi vlsi commented May 15, 2016

It looks like there are boot issues for "edge" Travis VMs (the ones that include jdk9-ea).
Here's the Travis build: https://travis-ci.org/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/builds/130389303

Here's the approach I used to setup jdk9: travis-ci/travis-ci#5520 (comment)

We might need to postpone jdk9 testing

@vlsi vlsi force-pushed the vlsi:jdk9 branch from 81a75f8 to 7b88c1c May 15, 2016
@vlsi vlsi force-pushed the vlsi:jdk9 branch from 7b88c1c to a536fb3 May 24, 2016
@vlsi vlsi force-pushed the vlsi:jdk9 branch 8 times, most recently from e085a09 to c166327 Jun 14, 2016
@vlsi vlsi force-pushed the vlsi:jdk9 branch from c166327 to a60b472 Jun 14, 2016
@vlsi vlsi closed this in bbb0d35 Jun 14, 2016
julianhyde added a commit to julianhyde/calcite that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2016
@vlsi vlsi deleted the vlsi:jdk9 branch Jun 22, 2016
@vlsi vlsi added this to the 9.4.1209 milestone Jul 11, 2016
zemian pushed a commit to zemian/pgjdbc that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants