Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: build site with jekyll 2.2.0 #755

merged 1 commit into from Feb 20, 2017


Copy link

@jorsol jorsol commented Feb 20, 2017

Now is able to build the site with Jekyll 2.2.

Since Jekyll 2.2 don't support include_relative, it's changed to include.

Additionally since the official release date is today, change 2017-02-18 dates.

After this is merged the site needs to be rebuild and uploaded again.

Copy link

@davecramer davecramer commented Feb 20, 2017

@jorsol jorsol force-pushed the jorsol:fix-jekyll-2.2 branch from 2744537 to c0f3e51 Feb 20, 2017
Copy link

@codecov-io codecov-io commented Feb 20, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #755 into master will decrease coverage by -0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #755      +/-   ##
- Coverage     65.27%   65.26%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     3497     3496       -1     
  Files           164      164              
  Lines         15120    15120              
  Branches       2450     2450              
- Hits           9869     9868       -1     
  Misses         4075     4075              
- Partials       1176     1177       +1

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4d8b1b3...c0f3e51. Read the comment docs.

@davecramer davecramer merged commit 773ee67 into pgjdbc:master Feb 20, 2017
@jorsol jorsol deleted the jorsol:fix-jekyll-2.2 branch Feb 20, 2017
davecramer added a commit to davecramer/pgjdbc that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.