New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix javadoc complaints and some small edits to replication comments #832

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 30, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@davecramer
Member

davecramer commented May 29, 2017

No description provided.

@codecov-io

This comment has been minimized.

codecov-io commented May 29, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #832 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #832   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     65.54%   65.54%           
  Complexity     3543     3543           
=========================================
  Files           166      166           
  Lines         15250    15250           
  Branches       2475     2475           
=========================================
  Hits           9995     9995           
  Misses         4075     4075           
  Partials       1180     1180

@davecramer davecramer merged commit 2d0bfce into pgjdbc:master May 30, 2017

2 checks passed

codecov/project 65.54% remains the same compared to 394b3a2
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details

ahachete added a commit to ahachete/pgjdbc that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2017

fix javadoc complaints and some small edits to replication comments (p…
…gjdbc#832)

* fix javadoc complaints and some small edits to replication comments

* fix checkstyle

davecramer added a commit to davecramer/pgjdbc that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2017

fix javadoc complaints and some small edits to replication comments (p…
…gjdbc#832)

* fix javadoc complaints and some small edits to replication comments

* fix checkstyle
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment