New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: skip ConcurrentStatementFetch for PostgreSQL < 8.4 #884

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 24, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@vlsi
Member

vlsi commented Jul 24, 2017

PostgreSQL 8.2 is known to close named portals unexpectedly, so we just ignore the test.
The following scenario might be affected: old backend version + setFetchSize + interleaved ResultSet processing

This is a follow-up for #870 and #869 for PostgreSQL < 8.4

@vlsi vlsi force-pushed the vlsi:v82_portals branch 2 times, most recently from 30926e0 to 061c38d Jul 24, 2017

test: skip ConcurrentStatementFetch for PostgreSQL < 8.4
PostgreSQL 8.2 is known to close named portals unexpectedly, so we just ignore the test.
The following scenario might be affected: old backend version + setFetchSize + interleaved ResultSet processing

This is a follow-up for #870 and #869 for PostgreSQL < 8.4

@vlsi vlsi force-pushed the vlsi:v82_portals branch from 061c38d to 995b53d Jul 24, 2017

@vlsi vlsi changed the title from WIP: check how named statements, named portals, and interleaved fetch plays with 8.2 to test: skip ConcurrentStatementFetch for PostgreSQL < 8.4 Jul 24, 2017

@vlsi vlsi added this to the 42.1.4 milestone Jul 24, 2017

@vlsi vlsi merged commit 5334cb6 into pgjdbc:master Jul 24, 2017

1 check failed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build could not complete due to an error
Details

davecramer added a commit to davecramer/pgjdbc that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2017

test: skip ConcurrentStatementFetch for PostgreSQL < 8.4 (pgjdbc#884)
PostgreSQL 8.2 is known to close named portals unexpectedly, so we just ignore the test.
The following scenario might be affected: old backend version + setFetchSize + interleaved ResultSet processing

This is a follow-up for pgjdbc#870 and pgjdbc#869 for PostgreSQL < 8.4
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment