PHOIBLE data and useful scripts.
TeX R
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Clone or download
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Permalink
Failed to load latest commit information.
data
gold-standard
mappings
raw-data
tests
.gitignore
LICENSE
README.md
aggregate-raw-data.R

README.md

PHOIBLE

PHOIBLE is a database of phonological inventories and distinctive features, encompassing more than 1600 languages (and growing). PHOIBLE data is published in browsable form online at PHOIBLE Online, which corresponds with the most recent year-numbered release of this repository.

Data in machine-readable form is available in this repository. It is not guaranteed to exactly match what is published at PHOIBLE Online, due to the occasional discovery and correction of errors, and the addition of new languages to the database. For this reason, it is recommended that you make use of the most recent dated release in your own analyses, rather than working from the tip of the master branch.

Documentation for PHOIBLE is hosted at at http://phoible.github.io/, including notational conventions, departures from official IPA usage, citation information, etc.

How to use this repository

Most people will not need to look beyond the root of this repository, which contains a phoneme-level data file (one row per language-phoneme pair), a language-level data file (one row per language, with various language-level aggregations like “total consonants” or “total segments”), and a BibTeX file of all the data sources. The code directory contains scripts used in the development and testing of PHOIBLE, such as code to aggregate the raw data files from the various donor databases. These are probably not of general interest or utility. The data directory contains the raw data from the various donor data sources, as well as the feature mapping tables. This is also probably not what you want, so if in doubt, stick to the root directory.

Citing PHOIBLE

If you are citing the database as a whole, or making use of the phonological distinctive feature systems in PHOIBLE, please cite as follows:

Moran, Steven & McCloy, Daniel & Wright, Richard (eds.) 2014. PHOIBLE Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://phoible.org.

If you are citing phoneme inventory data for a particular language or languages, please use the name of the language as the title, and include the original data source as an element within PHOIBLE. For example:

UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database. 2014. Lelemi sound inventory (UPSID). In: Moran, Steven & McCloy, Daniel & Wright, Richard (eds.) PHOIBLE Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://phoible.org/inventories/view/441.

If you are using the raw data from this repository but are not using a labeled release, we recommend citing using the last commit hash at the time of your most recent cloning/forking of the repository, so that others can reproduce your work starting from the same snapshot of the repository that you are using. For example:

Moran, Steven & McCloy, Daniel & Wright, Richard (eds.) 2015. PHOIBLE. https://github.com/phoible/phoible/commit/acebcf525998e5770b275c4049f05910887243cc

History

PHOIBLE was originally developed as an SQL database and RDF knowledgebase for Moran’s dissertation, which explains many of the technical details and developmental challenges:

Moran, Steven. 2012. Phonetics Information Base and Lexicon. PhD thesis, University of Washington. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/22452

Here is a brief list of some publications that have used PHOIBLE data:

  • Cysouw, Michael, Dan Dediu and Steven Moran. 2012. Still No Evidence for an Ancient Language Expansion from Africa. Science, 335(6069):657.
  • Moran, Steven. 2012. Using Linked Data to Create a Typological Knowledge Base. In Christian Chiarcos, Sebastian Nordhoff and Sebastian Hellmann (eds), Linked Data in Linguistics: Representing and Connecting Language Data and Language Metadata. Springer, Heidelberg.
  • Moran, Steven, Daniel McCloy, and Richard Wright. 2012. Revisiting Population Size vs. Phoneme Inventory Size. Language 88(4): 877-893.
  • Moran, Steven and Damián Blasi. 2014. Cross-linguistic Comparison of Complexity Measures in Phonological Systems. In Frederick J. Newmeyer and Laurel Preston (eds), Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford UP, Oxford.