Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/link statically against tf #206

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Jan 19, 2020

Conversation

graciousgrey
Copy link
Member

@graciousgrey graciousgrey commented Jan 17, 2020


IssueHunt Summary

Referenced issues

This pull request has been submitted to:


IssueHunt has been backed by the following sponsors. Become a sponsor

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #206 into develop will increase coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 90%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #206      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    52.71%   52.84%   +0.13%     
===========================================
  Files          125      126       +1     
  Lines         5314     5331      +17     
===========================================
+ Hits          2801     2817      +16     
- Misses        2284     2285       +1     
  Partials       229      229
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/photoprism/index.go 45.45% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
internal/config/config.go 63.93% <100%> (+0.3%) ⬆️
internal/photoprism/import.go 74.51% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
internal/photoprism/convert.go 70.97% <100%> (+6.77%) ⬆️
internal/photoprism/convert_worker.go 50% <50%> (ø)
internal/maps/location.go 94.94% <0%> (-1.27%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9666103...214f4b6. Read the comment docs.

@lastzero lastzero merged commit 6b1babe into develop Jan 19, 2020
@lastzero lastzero deleted the feature/link-statically-against-TF branch January 21, 2020 10:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants