Numeric format #12897

OlafvdSpek opened this Issue Jan 15, 2017 · 2 comments


None yet

2 participants


Overhead: 1,434.2 MiB

Should be #.## GiB


Git revision: b40e9c1 from master branch,
committed on Jan 08, 2017 at 09:02 AM by Michal Čihař

nijel commented Jan 18, 2017

This was intentional change ages ago (0f74231) see #5953

However I really don't think it does address the original report properly, it fixes it only for case where the difference is not big enough...

@nijel nijel added the enhancement label Jan 18, 2017

As posted back then: "Sorting is easier than manually scanning.."

@nijel nijel self-assigned this Jan 20, 2017
@nijel nijel added a commit that closed this issue Jan 20, 2017
@nijel nijel Use consistent numeric format for table overhead
Using 4 digits is not really consistent with rest of the UI.

Basically this reverts 0f74231.

Fixes #12897

Signed-off-by: Michal Čihař <>
@nijel nijel closed this in 1d732ed Jan 20, 2017
@nijel nijel added this to the 4.7.0 milestone Jan 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment