New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lift the restriction on pragmarx/google2fa #16407
Comments
|
cc @MauricioFauth @ibennetch |
|
I don't remember why I added |
|
It looks strange, I will surely sort out this after next 5.0 is out. Thank you for the feedback :) Line 67 in e6d84af
Seems like you did not want image backends 🤔 (https://github.com/antonioribeiro/google2fa-qrcode/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#101---2018-10-10) |
This is because we can't add a minimum requirement to suggested packages.
If I remember correctly, I added this to avoid a bug in pragmarx/google2fa 6.1 and forgot about that. |
|
What is your hope here, to replace the pragmarx/google2fa library with something else? |
I had forgotten about this but I believe you are correct...I can't remember what the bug was exactly, but that version requirement sounds familiar for fixing something. |
I just want to clarify the restrictions because I have some Debian packaging to do and I can't afford to loose months of work for one line ^^ Maybe insure we can swap in and out 2FA providers very easily :) |
Signed-off-by: William Desportes <williamdes@wdes.fr>
Signed-off-by: William Desportes <williamdes@wdes.fr>
|
Fixed by cc6d1be |
…ible Because of this commit: antonioribeiro/google2fa@c1bb594 Fixed the tests for newer versions. Signed-off-by: William Desportes <williamdes@wdes.fr>
|
The reason why we added the conflict is in this commit d7a27c3 |
Thank you, William. I added the conflict line and forgot to fix it later. |
Ref: #14074
Re-licenced to MIT antonioribeiro/google2fa#100
MIT since 3.0.1 https://github.com/antonioribeiro/google2fa/blob/8.x/CHANGELOG.md#301---2018-03-15
phpmyadmin/composer.json
Line 66 in e6d84af
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: