Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default NULL is ignored for datetime type #16975

Closed
liviuconcioiu opened this issue Jun 20, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #17008
Closed

Default NULL is ignored for datetime type #16975

liviuconcioiu opened this issue Jun 20, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #17008
Assignees
Labels
Bug A problem or regression with an existing feature ui Issues relating to the user interface
Projects
Milestone

Comments

@liviuconcioiu
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug

NULL as default value is ignored for datetime type.

Screenshots

datetimenull1
datetimenull2

@williamdes williamdes added Bug A problem or regression with an existing feature ui Issues relating to the user interface labels Jun 21, 2021
@williamdes williamdes added this to Needs triage in issues via automation Jun 21, 2021
@williamdes williamdes moved this from Needs triage to to be fixed soon in issues Jun 21, 2021
@williamdes williamdes added this to the 5.1.2 milestone Jul 13, 2021
@williamdes williamdes self-assigned this Jul 13, 2021
@williamdes
Copy link
Member

williamdes commented Jul 13, 2021

Also affects timestamps Nope: it was respecting the default value

williamdes added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
Signed-off-by: William Desportes <williamdes@wdes.fr>
issues automation moved this from to be fixed soon to Closed Jul 13, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 14, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Bug A problem or regression with an existing feature ui Issues relating to the user interface
Projects
issues
  
Closed
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants