2014 01_Meeting_IRC_Log

Michal Čihař edited this page Apr 14, 2016 · 2 revisions
(11:00:48) Marc9: Meeting starts, welcome to everyone
(11:01:02) Marc9: Item 1, team membership
(11:01:50) Marc9: I am in favor of Michal's proposal; at first I was not sure about commit access,
(11:01:59) zixtor [~zixtor@14.142.34.139] a rejoint le salon.
(11:02:06) Marc9: but with github, pull requests are easy to do and to deal with.
(11:02:21) madhuracj: I am also in favor of Michal's proposal
(11:02:40) Marc9: See http://wiki.phpmyadmin.net/pma/2014-01_Meeting
(11:02:40) chanaka777 [cb3eaf04@gateway/web/freenode/ip.203.62.175.4] a rejoint le salon.
(11:02:40) nijel: The main motivation for me was simplicity - we're small team, so bringing in more levels is IMHO not

needed.
(11:02:55) Marc9: Hi Atul and Chanaka
(11:03:03) chanaka777: Hi
(11:03:03) madhuracj: @nijel Indeed
(11:03:11) zixtor: Hi all, sorry I'm late
(11:03:25) mynetx: Simplicity ftw.
(11:03:29) Marc9: We are at item 1, team membership
(11:04:01) Marc9: Any objection for Michal's proposal?
(11:04:11) ibennetch: I think that approach is good as well.
(11:06:04) Marc9: Depending on item 2, we would accept new members only once per month...
(11:06:31) Marc9: Item 1 is accepted.
(11:06:45) Marc9: Item 2: committee voting rules
(11:07:10) zixtor: I'm okay with voting on IRC
(11:07:36) nijel: for me IRC is okay as well
(11:07:37) mynetx: I'm okay with voting on IRC, if one can send a proxy vote in beforehand to somebody.
(11:07:38) madhuracj: Any other opinions?
(11:07:58) ibennetch: Either is fine by me, in the event someone is not able to make the IRC meeting I do think it's better

to vote after the meeting
(11:08:12) ibennetch: As there can be further discussion that might affect their vote
(11:08:43) ibennetch: But so far the early proxy vote has worked fine so maybe I'm wrong about that anyway
(11:08:44) madhuracj: Voting in IRC is ok for me as well
(11:09:11) Marc9: I think that someone also said that we should trust the vote done on IRC, unless we don't have the quorum
(11:09:31) nijel: okay
(11:10:01) Marc9: I would like to be able to call an email vote between meetings, however.
(11:10:18) ibennetch: Seems fine
(11:10:20) zixtor: Marc9, fine by me
(11:10:58) nijel: indeed email vote is always possible
(11:10:59) Marc9: but let's say that normal votes will be done during the meeting
(11:11:20) chanaka777: Does it valid only untill the IRC meeting going on ?
(11:11:37) Marc9: ?
(11:11:46) chanaka777: email vote ?
(11:12:11) zixtor: chanaka777,  email vote is between two meetings..
(11:12:14) Marc9: It would be valid by itself
(11:12:27) Marc9: no need to revote at the next meeting IMO
(11:13:12) chanaka777: fine by me
(11:13:20) nijel: okay
(11:13:42) zixtor: next item ?
(11:13:46) Marc9: Item 3
(11:14:06) Marc9: Vote to accept Rouslan Placella's resignation
(11:14:17) Marc9: Say yes or no
(11:14:32) Hugues_: yes
(11:14:42) Hugues_: (Sorry, little bit late...)
(11:14:42) Marc9: Yes
(11:14:44) pipelineaudio_ [~pipelinea@75.95.236.198] a rejoint le salon.
(11:14:50) zixtor: Yes
(11:15:08) chanaka777: No
(11:15:10) pipelineaudio a quitté le salon (quit: Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
(11:15:34) madhuracj: Yes
(11:15:35) mynetx: yes.
(11:15:37) Hugues_: Is it time to ask why ?
(11:15:41) nijel: yes
(11:15:52) nijel: Hugues_: basically lack of time
(11:16:54) Marc9: I think we should add a point at the end of meeting: about how to remain a team member
(11:17:07) Hugues_: No, I mean: Why no ?
(11:17:19) Marc9: So, Rouslan's resignation is accepted (majority)
(11:17:31) mynetx: Marc9: Point: Definitely agreed. Can we have a Wiki page for that, too?
(11:17:43) Hugues_: R
(11:17:52) Marc9: Vote to accept Hugues Peccatte in the team
(11:17:55) Hugues_: Ok with you, Marc9 .
(11:18:06) Marc9: Yes to Hugues
(11:18:28) nijel: yes
(11:18:36) chanaka777: yes
(11:18:42) zixtor: Yes, welcome Hugues_
(11:18:55) ibennetch: Yes to Hugues_
(11:18:56) madhuracj: Yes
(11:19:15) Marc9: Hugues accepted
(11:19:31) Hugues_: Thanks a lot !
(11:19:47) ibennetch: Welcome ;-)
(11:19:51) Marc9: Vote for Piotr Przybylski as team member
(11:20:05) Marc9: No: he contributes too infrequently
(11:20:56) Marc9: (he was a GSoC student for three years)
(11:21:11) zixtor: No, haven't seen him in my time
(11:21:28) mynetx: I once even had to ask Marc why he has commit access
(11:21:28) madhuracj: FIrst of all has shown interest in joining the team?
(11:21:43) nijel: no, though this means removing him commit access, what might even lower his motivation to contribute...
(11:21:58) Hugues_: No : never see him... :/
(11:22:48) Marc9: nijel, well we can point him to this team meeting's decisions about the commit access only for team

members
(11:22:49) madhuracj: @nijel with github and pull requests I think we no longer need to give commit access to people

outside the team
(11:22:54) zixtor: Pull requests may be the way
(11:23:28) madhuracj: For the record No from me
(11:23:34) mynetx: We will see if Piotr sends pull requests
(11:23:36) nijel: I agree that it's not a big barrier
(11:24:10) Marc9: I don't think we ever asked him to be a team member, because after GSoC he did not continue regularly
(11:24:19) ibennetch: I tend to agree, his contributions are welcome but he is infrequent at the moment.
(11:24:57) Marc9: Ok, decision has been done: Piotr will lose commit access
(11:25:04) Hugues_: https://github.com/Crack Just to see how regular he is.
(11:25:17) Marc9: Item 4, Light version/mobile
(11:25:50) Marc9: Any opinions about this?
(11:26:22) zixtor: I dont see a direct relation at the moment, between a 1484 and mobile version..
(11:27:06) Hugues_: This version would be only a read-only access ?
(11:27:07) Marc9: What is 1484 ?
(11:27:17) zixtor: https://sourceforge.net/p/phpmyadmin/feature-requests/1484/
(11:27:18) Hugues_: The feature request.
(11:27:18) ibennetch: On this matter, I'm not sure. We certainly want to appeal to the widest audience, but try to do

system administration from my tablet is not ideal.
(11:28:21) chanaka777: yes, we need to identify real use of this
(11:28:22) zixtor: Maybe we could hav a GSoC  project for this
(11:28:24) Marc9: mynetx you suggested this, any opinion?
(11:28:48) nijel: I'm also not convinced about need for mobile version
(11:28:51) mynetx: How many users really use advanced features like Designer or PDF export?
(11:29:29) mynetx: [leaving in 3m]
(11:29:52) Marc9: mynetx I bet not many users know about these features
(11:29:54) ibennetch: Can we improve things by having a mobile theme?
(11:30:31) ibennetch: Without making major changes to the code base, perhaps we could implement a team with larger buttons

and perhaps not displaying some features.
(11:30:45) ibennetch: Though I am quick to point out that I do not know how feasible that is
(11:30:54) zixtor: we could many other features for mobile version, like monitor, GIS
(11:30:57) Marc9: Let's say that a student has a good idea about this. Who could mentor this project (not me) ?
(11:31:00) zixtor: *we could drop
(11:31:25) Hugues_: Maybe we could use twitter bootstrap ? ...
(11:31:37) Hugues_: So we would have responsive design...
(11:31:38) mynetx: Hugues_ Good idea imo.
(11:31:54) mynetx: Can you add this to the Mobile_version wiki page?
(11:32:41) nijel: using bootstrap might be good option
(11:32:54) Marc9: The main reason I am not convinced about a mobile version, is just the amount of data to display when

browsing a table, for example
(11:33:05) ibennetch: I would be interested in mentoring but am not familiar with "twitter bootstrap"
(11:33:39) zixtor: I'm not familiar either
(11:33:39) ibennetch: Yes Marc9  I agree
(11:34:16) Marc9: But again, I am happy when visiting the mobile version of wikipedia (however it's not tabular data)
(11:34:23) mynetx: [off]
(11:34:42) mynetx: We may delay this discussion further, if we need more clarification/research?
(11:35:12) Marc9: Well, we must not wait too much, GSoC ideas page is waiting for us ...
(11:35:32) Hugues_: I think that would be a huge work I think.
(11:35:48) Hugues_: How long is the GSoC please ?
(11:36:04) Marc9: A good point: does it fit within the 12-week ?
(11:36:08) ibennetch: Perhaps in the coming days we can discuss on the mailing list but time is dwindling
(11:36:44) zixtor: We may start a thread on devel with priority discussion
(11:36:48) Marc9: Ok, let's continue the discussion on the devel list. Anyway we might have more suggestions there
(11:36:51) ibennetch: Perhaps we should add it to the ideas page and then evaluate any proposals that come in based on the

work they propose.
(11:36:52) Hugues_: 3 months, maybe, with someone working all the time on this improvement.
(11:36:56) nijel: I think it's doable withing 12 weeks, but the student would need existing knowledge of bootstrap
(11:37:28) Marc9: ibennetch: we might do it but frankly I am not in position to clarify eventual questions about this

subject
(11:38:02) Marc9: Let's change subject?
(11:38:12) ibennetch: Agreed to move on
(11:38:32) Marc9: Item 5, how to remain a team member :)
(11:39:03) Marc9: There was discussion about how "active" someone has to be
(11:39:27) Marc9: About voting on this, possible suspicion climate
(11:39:33) zixtor: Marc9,  Yeah, but the participation in discussion was rather low..
(11:41:02) Marc9: Is it enough to mention that regular activity is needed to remain a member?
(11:41:12) Marc9: *is requested*
(11:41:13) zixtor a quitté le salon (quit: Read error: Connection reset by peer)
(11:41:31) madhuracj: Well, I'd love to have a way of quantifying "active". But I bet we will never be able to do that.
(11:42:35) zixtor [~zixtor@14.142.132.230] a rejoint le salon.
(11:43:04) Marc9: madhuracj, yes; it's more subjective that that. It includes participation in the mailing list, commits,

help on stackoverflow, infrastructure work (which is more hidden), etc
(11:43:18) Marc9: *than that*
(11:43:30) madhuracj: Indeed
(11:43:31) nijel: I think it's better to decide this case by case, providing strict rules might just lead to making

exceptions as it's really hard to measure activity in all areas
(11:43:53) Marc9: Can we discuss Dieter's case now?
(11:43:57) madhuracj: @nijel Yes
(11:44:14) ibennetch: I tend to give some leeway because I realize people can get busy while still remaining involved, but

I don't have a way to quantify "active"
(11:44:15) ibennetch: Lines of code are a poor metric, number of commits can be skewed due to using more commits where

fewer would do, etc.
(11:44:15) ibennetch: I guess what's best is to evaluate as a team on an ongoing basis if someone is participating less

than expected.
(11:44:26) Hugues_: Like you said, this is a small team... Do we need to quantify ? Can't we decide for each case ?
(11:44:36) madhuracj: If we can promote an environment where members would voluntarily step down when they do not have time

it would be best IMO
(11:44:55) Marc9: madhuracj, that's what I told Hugues in a private mail ;)
(11:45:00) zixtor: madhuracj, agreed
(11:45:05) Hugues_: I agree with this, madhuracj .
(11:45:52) chanaka777: me too
(11:45:59) Marc9: madhuracj, but apparently the climate is not there yet (or not for everyone)
(11:46:13) nijel: I see this as best approach
(11:46:50) zixtor: Now, there can be different personal versions of "how much can I contribute"
(11:47:37) madhuracj: When voluntarary stepping down is not happening I think we can vote on IRC.
(11:48:20) chanaka777: yes that option is reasonable
(11:48:41) Hugues_: Maybe we could think to warn people, when they are not active enough anymore.
(11:48:41) madhuracj: But I'm afraid this might have negative impact on the person(s) whose bringing the topic to agenda
(11:49:12) Marc9: madhuracj, yes, so zixtor suggested that this should be the duty of the two project admins
(11:49:19) zixtor: Indeed, a climate of suspicion as said by dieter
(11:49:34) Hugues_: Warn, and concerned people should think : Am I still involved or not ?
(11:49:45) madhuracj: @Hugues I'd reword it as "Asking whether they are really busy these days" :)
(11:50:12) zixtor: madhuracj, thats nicer :)
(11:50:15) Hugues_: Yes, but how long are the days ?
(11:50:25) ibennetch: I tend to think a private vote may be better in this case
(11:50:25) ibennetch: But either way someone from the team would first need to bring the matter to the person (and team's)

attention
(11:50:25) ibennetch: Giving them an opportunity to step up or step down (contriuvt more or resign)
(11:50:26) ibennetch: *contribute*
(11:50:27) Hugues_: If you are busy for 6 months...
(11:50:55) Hugues_: ibennetch: Agreed ! :)
(11:50:58) zixtor: We must have a secret ballot for any such vote
(11:51:15) madhuracj: @ibennetch: agreed
(11:51:20) Marc9: ibennetch: that's what I did, to the persons first; I got one negative reaction and one positive
(11:51:53) Hugues_: zixtor: ok, let's try. Private system should exist.
(11:52:27) Marc9: Hugues, that's why I suggested a third party to receive such kind of vote
(11:52:46) ibennetch: So I think for a process we are developing and learning to do as a group that we are doing the right

things.
(11:53:31) ibennetch: In the case a vote is needed I hope Conservancy would help; it just means counting votes. They

wouldn't need to evaluate any one's involvement for us.
(11:53:31) zixtor: Marc9,  Project admins could also do that in my opinion, if they are the ones to initiate the voting..
(11:54:03) Marc9: ibennetch and zixtor: both good suggestions
(11:54:06) ibennetch: Ah zixtor has a good point
(11:55:05) ibennetch: Still I think involving Conservancy for vote counting will be best
(11:55:22) ibennetch: That way it lifts any burden or suspicion.
(11:55:35) Marc9: I agree with involving Conservancy
(11:55:39) nijel: Indeed, using Conservancy is good idea
(11:55:51) zixtor: Should we ask Conservancy ?
(11:55:59) Hugues_: We could ask if they would agree.
(11:56:00) zixtor: if they could help us with such a thing
(11:56:20) madhuracj: @zixtor: i feel we can wait till the need arises
(11:56:33) madhuracj: Im being hopeful that this wouldnt be needed ever
(11:56:37) Hugues_: Sorry, I've to go. Bye.
(11:56:52) zixtor: madhuracj, agreed
(11:56:58) Marc9: Bye Hugues
(11:57:22) Hugues_ a quitté le salon (quit: Quit: Page closed)
(11:57:28) Marc9: Can we add a short item 6: LinuxTag 2014 ?
(11:57:38) Marc9: Three minutes....
(11:57:53) zixtor: I'm there for 5 minutes
(11:57:53) madhuracj: Fine by me
(11:57:56) Marc9: I would like a team meeting there and I am available
(11:58:15) madhuracj: I am also in favor
(11:58:46) ibennetch: There was a question from Marc "Can we discuss Dieter's case now?" -- did we do that already?
(11:59:09) Marc9: ibennetch: there was no interest, I assume
(11:59:24) ibennetch: Also LinuxTag seems like a great location; I'm not certain whether I can get time off of work but

either way think its an ideal location
(11:59:27) zixtor: Dieter case?
(11:59:53) zixtor: LinuxTag is ok by me
(12:00:02) Marc9: Dieter's case: does his reduced involvement count as remaining a team member
(12:00:05) whod a quitté le salon
(12:00:13) nijel: LinuxTag is okay for me.
(12:00:28) ibennetch: (I didn't want to distract from the other discussion but also didn't want to forget it.)
(12:00:48) chanaka777: LinuxTag ok for me as well
(12:01:10) Marc9: So I believe that LinuxTag is accepted, yeah!
(12:01:18) zixtor: yes
(12:01:24) zixtor: Marc9, He said, he wanted to be security spokesperson as I remember..
(12:01:51) Marc9: zixtor, yes, and backup admin on the server
(12:02:04) nijel: about Dieter: I think if he will keep the tasks (security coordinator and backup admin), I find the

involvement good enough.
(12:02:20) madhuracj: I think the same
(12:02:43) zixtor: I also support voluntary declaration
(12:03:35) Marc9: I propose the end of meeting
Clone this wiki locally
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.
Press h to open a hovercard with more details.