New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make auth = basic the default again #461

Closed
untitaker opened this Issue Jun 7, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@untitaker
Member

untitaker commented Jun 7, 2016

auth = guess, as implemented in #57 (#33), was a bad idea to have as default:

  • It causes performance issues and confusing server logs, as in #293, #446
  • Apparently Darwin Calendar Server breaks with anything but preemptive auth, see #457

@geier I'm not sure if I ever asked you this, but is there a particular server you know of that doesn't support preemptive basic auth?

I plan to ask on the CalConnect mailing list on what the best client behavior is.

@geier

This comment has been minimized.

Member

geier commented Jun 7, 2016

no, I know of no servers that don't support basic auth.

Quoting Markus Unterwaditzer (2016-06-07 13:06:38)

auth = guess, as implemented in #57 (#33), was a bad idea to have as default:

  • It causes performance issues and confusing server logs, as in #293, #446
  • Apparently Darwin Calendar Server breaks with anything but preemptive auth, see #457

@geier I'm not sure if I ever asked you this, but is there a particular server you know of that doesn't support preemptive basic auth?

I plan to ask on the CalConnect mailing list on what the best client behavior is.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#461

@untitaker untitaker added this to the 1.0 milestone Jun 10, 2016

untitaker added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2016

@untitaker untitaker self-assigned this Jun 16, 2016

untitaker added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2016

untitaker added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2016

untitaker added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 17, 2016

@untitaker untitaker removed the in progress label Jun 17, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment