New system check to warn that Piwik is not compatible with mod_security #3371

mattab opened this Issue Sep 8, 2012 · 9 comments

5 participants

Piwik Open Source Analytics member

Reported in: #2997, some work was done in the early days in #1460

  • Hostgator users need to contact their host to disable mod_security. Hundreds of piwik users have had to contact their hosts to disable mod_security.
  • There are several known issues with Piwik and mod_security!

I have found that almost all rules in modsecurity_crs_41_sql_injection_attacks.conf need 

for google adwords, google analytics  and piwik to work ok with mod_security.
Pattern match "\\%(?![0-9a-fA-F]{2}|u[0-9a-fA-F]{4})" at ARGS:pattern. [file "/usr/local/apache/conf/modsec2.user.conf"] [line "20"] [id "1234123440"] [msg "URL Encoding Abuse Attack Attempt"] [severity "WARNING"]
  U4n-qUIt@YIADWbyzkUAAAB1 35095 80

As a proposed solution to inform users of potential issues early:

  • Write a system check entry to check for mod_security and issue Warning if it is detected.

    • Suggest to user that it is OK to disable mod_security for Piwik app.
  • Maybe in this system check message we could also link to FAQ and this FAQ could list the rules to disable in the mod_security config. if some users reading here may contribute them?

See similar #5081

Piwik Open Source Analytics member

It's never going to happen I think!

Piwik Open Source Analytics member

Also reported here:,88617,page=1#msg-98619

In the custom rule file, add following lines:

# Allow Piwik queries
  SecRule REQUEST_FILENAME "^/path_to_your_piwik_dir/piwik\.php$" id:99998,log,phase:2,chain,allow
  SecRule ARGS_NAMES "^action_name$"

  SecRule REQUEST_FILENAME "^/path_to_your_piwik_dir/index\.php$" id:99999,log,phase:2,chain,allow
  SecRule ARGS_NAMES "^module$"

@mattab mattab removed the Major label Aug 3, 2014

Is there any update to this? I have my hosting with HostGator shared hosting and they are not willing to disable mod_sec for the whole server. The one tech I talked with said he could disable some rules for my domain as long as they are not flagged as required for them - but he would need to know which rules to disable. Is there any progress in knowing what rules to disable? This could be a path to allowing many more users to install Piwik. God Willing. Thanks.


Same problem here with napa-web-designer. HostGator told us that they can't disable mod_sec for the whole server because i'm on a shared hosting. They just need to know which rules to disable. I don't know what rule it is to tell them.


Same, i'm on hostgator


This problem exists also on my host. Any chance we can get the right custom rules that we can suggest to the hoster ?

Piwik Open Source Analytics member

Hello guys, at this point we do not have enough information to know how to make progress re: this issue.

The short answer: your web host should ideally not enable software that break stuff. mod_security rules are really breaking Piwik and it's not Piwik's fault (unfortunately, because that also means we can't easily fix it).

Maybe you have some details which mod security rules trigger the warnings/errors? Maybe we could contact Hostgator to get them to disable such rules for Piwik users...

ordex commented Jul 8, 2016 edited

I do agree with you: it's the way they have configured mod_sec that is breaking non-malicious applications and should be their duty to fix it.
However, I also do understand their position of not being willing to modify the mod_sec configuration to pleasure one app only (they may not know what else it will break b ychanging the config)...
Honestly, I don't know what to suggest :) But at least I got a log from my hoster OnlyDomains about my IP being blocked. Posting it here just in case it can be useful in a way or another:

 ~/scripts/ -s x.x.x.x -t $(date --date="Thu Jul  7 03:16:38 2016" +"%s") -r 300 -n 1234123440
Last result:

--f9ceae7f-A-- [07/Jul/2016:03:16:32 --0500] V34P4HdRQuoAAronW7MAAAAS
x.x.x.x 48624 x.x.x.x 80 --f9ceae7f-B-- POST
HTTP/1.1 Host: [1] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11;
Linux x86_64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/47.0 Accept: application/json,
text/plain, */* Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
DNT: 1 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Cache-Control: no-cache
Content-Length: 43 Cookie:
PIWIK_SESSID=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Via: 1.1 x.x.x.x Connection:
keep-alive --f9ceae7f-F-- HTTP/1.1 406 Not Acceptable Content-Length: 532
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=91 Connection: Keep-Alive Content-Type: text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1 --f9ceae7f-H-- Message: Access denied with code 406 (phase
2). Pattern match "\\%(?![0-9a-fA-F]{2}|u[0-9a-fA-F]{4})" at ARGS:pattern.
[file "/usr/local/apache/conf/modsec2.user.conf"] [line "50"] [id
"1234123440"] [msg "URL Encoding Abuse Attack Attempt"] [severity "WARNING"]
Apache-Error: [file "core.c"] [line 3722] [level 3] File does not exist:
/home/wzoq9i8f/public_html/406.shtml, referer:
Action: Intercepted (phase 2) Stopwatch: Thu Jul 7 03:16:32 2016 985 (- - -)
Stopwatch2: Thu Jul 7 03:16:32 2016 985; combined=114, p1=67, p2=45, p3=0,
p4=0, p5=2, sr=31, sw=0, l=0, gc=0 Producer: ModSecurity for Apache/2.9.0
( Server: Apache/2.2.31 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.31
OpenSSL/1.0.1e-fips mod_bwlimited/1.4 Engine-Mode: "ENABLED" --f9ceae7f

does it ring any bell ? something that can be changed in piwik to workaround this ? I know this has already be answered...but just in case this log has something different..


Piwik Open Source Analytics member

Hi @ordex thanks for the log line. In this case I believe the issue is that the Piwik URL index.php?date=today&format=JSON2&idSite=1&limit=15&method=SitesManager.getPatternMatchSites&module=API&pattern=%25&period=day matches the rule %(?![0-9a-fA-F]{2}|u[0-9a-fA-F]{4}) via the %25 in pattern=%25... it is the URL encoded of %, likely someone searches for % in the Search bar in the Site selector...

If anyone has some other log lines matching some other mod security rules, feel free to post them here.

@mattab mattab modified the milestone: 2.16.x (LTS), Long term Jul 11, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment