Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the advanced_search input is present twice #1664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 22, 2016
Merged

Conversation

Gagaro
Copy link
Member

@Gagaro Gagaro commented Jul 7, 2016

The second occurence is there.

I think the first one shouldn't be there. We have the advanced_query parameter in double with both False and True as a value if we keep them both.

@davilima6
Copy link
Member

Lgtm

@davilima6 davilima6 added this to the Plone 5.0.x milestone Jul 7, 2016
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
.. This file should contain the changes for the last release only, which
[6~].. This file should contain the changes for the last release only, which
Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is that maybe a typo? What is this [6~] for?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry about that, it's my emacs.

Copy link
Sponsor Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no problem, it's always a good idea to double check your commits before pushing, but that's what pull requests for as well :-)

I started a jenkins job to test the pull request, let's see if jenkins agrees on your changes.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I usually do, but this one was literally 20 seconds before I had to left 😋 . Thanks for the review.

The second occurence is [there](https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/blob/master/Products/CMFPlone/browser/templates/search.pt#L64-L65).

I think the first one shouldn't be there. We have the advanced_query parameter in double with both False and True as a value if we keep them both.
@jensens jensens merged commit a00c10b into master Jul 22, 2016
@jensens jensens deleted the fix-advanced_search branch July 22, 2016 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants