Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for community feedback on our new experimental ChatGPT integration #9116

jamest-portainer opened this issue Jun 23, 2023 · 11 comments
area/chatgpt feedback-wanted Indicates that the PR can be tested in its current state status/stale


Copy link

jamest-portainer commented Jun 23, 2023

Hello you people!

In Portainer Business Edition 2.18.3, we introduced a new experimental ChatGPT integration - hopefully you've given it a try.

This allows you to use your own OpenAI key to interact with ChatGPT (3.5, at present).

We prime requests to ChatGPT with context around the fact you're using Portainer and basic information about the type of environment you currently have open (whether Docker Swarm, Kubernetes, etc.). Note that we don't send any specific information about your deployments.

You can ask for examples of manifests, explanations of terminology and whatever else you like.

We'd really appreciate your feedback on this feature - what are your likes, dislikes and ideas for improvements?

James T.
Product Owner, Portainer


@jamest-portainer jamest-portainer added feedback-wanted Indicates that the PR can be tested in its current state area/chatgpt labels Jun 23, 2023
Copy link

I dont have Business Edition but I would think that its not good idea to integrate ChatGPT to Portainer because it might be security risk.

It might give bad responses that some may execute without second thought.

In my opinion its better to focus on Portainers main task instead of integration miscellaneous things to it.

If this is optional feature then its maybe OK as long as it doesn't connect your Portainer to OpenAI server without that API Token.

Not like the Matomo script that executes even when statistics are disabled in settings.

Copy link

@cwchristerw, thanks for the feedback.
I hear you on the security side. Note that we do give a warning that 'Chat responses may contain inaccurate information.'.
Regarding integrations in general, the idea behind this one specifically was to help less advanced users.
As for the Matomo script, it is included in the page but it only makes a call if statistics are enabled.

@jamest-portainer jamest-portainer pinned this issue Jul 11, 2023
Copy link

mudler commented Jul 16, 2023

Hey, LocalAI author here,

I think this is great and would be really cool to see Portainer be able to leverage solutions like . In this way there is no need of data to leave your server.

From a technical point of view should be rather easy, it is enough to let the user specify a URL for the OpenAI API server endpoint

Copy link

NickTaylorAS commented Jul 19, 2023

I strongly urge caution. I don't think a documentation simulator is something that should be added to any product.

Chat responses may contain inaccurate information

That has no business being in a commercial product, and I don't want to see it in an open-source one either TBH.

Copy link

jdelta1 commented Jul 19, 2023

If you want community feedback, try adding it to the community edition.

Copy link

It would probably be costly @jdelta1

Copy link

The community can't give their feedback, it doesn't make sense.

Copy link

I don't have a credit card, so I cannot use ChatGPT integration (openai only allows cc transactions), however I do have a GitHub Copilot subscription. It would be cool to have it work with GitHub Copilot too. I am not sure if it is possible though, but maybe a consideration point.

Copy link

No, just No.

Copy link

This issue has been marked as stale as it has not had recent activity, it will be closed if no further activity occurs in the next 7 days. If you believe that it has been incorrectly labelled as stale, leave a comment and the label will be removed.

Copy link

Since no further activity has appeared on this issue it will be closed. If you believe that it has been incorrectly closed, leave a comment mentioning portainer/support and one of our staff will then review the issue. Note - If it is an old bug report, make sure that it is reproduceable in the latest version of Portainer as it may have already been fixed.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 19, 2023
@jamescarppe jamescarppe unpinned this issue Nov 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
area/chatgpt feedback-wanted Indicates that the PR can be tested in its current state status/stale
None yet

No branches or pull requests

8 participants