Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HDF5 Support #3

Closed
apryor6 opened this issue Oct 31, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

HDF5 Support #3

apryor6 opened this issue Oct 31, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@apryor6
Copy link
Collaborator

apryor6 commented Oct 31, 2017

A suitable HDF5 format such as EMD would be vastly superior to the current choice of outputting many smaller files, particularly for the 4D output

@cophus
Copy link
Collaborator

cophus commented Dec 5, 2017

Of course I would also vote in favour of EMD format:
https://emdatasets.com/format/

Another major advantage of HDF5 (whether EMD or no) is packaging up all of the simulation outputs into a single file. These include the parameter files, the 3D and / or 4D outputs, projected potentials, atomic coordinates, or even the multislice vs PRISM validation simulation(s).

@lerandc lerandc closed this as completed Jul 3, 2019
@lerandc
Copy link
Collaborator

lerandc commented Jul 3, 2019

HDF5 has been implemented!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants