Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update charter given feedback in #2, #3, #6, #8, and #10. #5

Merged
merged 21 commits into from Feb 11, 2020
Merged

Conversation

@hober
Copy link
Member

hober commented Feb 4, 2020

From #2, especially @travisleithead's comment:

  • Add text to the charter describing the pre-deliverable proposal phase.
  • Tweak example destinations (drop WebAppSec?)
  • Rename "deliverable" to something less serious sounding

From #3:

  • use the word incubation
  • Refrain from calling things standards or specifications
  • Define the lifecycles of proposals and deliverables
    • describe exit conditions for an incubation
    • for how / whether a proposal should be abandoned/dropped from the group
    • or how a proposal should complete incubation
@hober

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

hober commented Feb 5, 2020

I've attempted to address a whole bunch of this feedback in 0d58d27:

  • use the word "incubate" more places
  • renamed "deliverable" to "work item"
  • added section defining (pre-work item) proposals and their lifecycle
  • defined the lifecycle of a work item
  • dropped use of the words "standard" or "specification" when talking about work items

Left to do:

  • adjust the examples of WGs that work might end up in (drop WebAppSec?)
  • spell out some considerations for how to choose a WG to migrate a work item to
@hober hober requested review from erik-anderson and TanviHacks Feb 5, 2020
charter.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
charter.html Show resolved Hide resolved
@hober

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

hober commented Feb 6, 2020

Progress update:

in 66c8fec:

  • added the TAG to the list of groups to coordinate with.
  • Require TAG review of work items at some point during their lifecycle.
  • Add examples of PING and TAG output that should be considered when working on proposals and work items.

in 43b6aeb and 5d4b6fe:

  • Clarify lifecycle of proposals and work items

Still to do:

  • describe / define the Chairs' role in focusing the group on particular proposals or work items
@hober hober mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2020
charter.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@TanviHacks TanviHacks self-requested a review Feb 7, 2020
Copy link
Member

TanviHacks left a comment

Thanks for making these changes Tess! They look good to me.

charter.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
charter.html Show resolved Hide resolved
charter.html Show resolved Hide resolved
charter.html Show resolved Hide resolved
charter.html Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

travisleithead left a comment

This is definitely an improvement.

I can live with it. However the more chill and process-averse part of me thinks the whole Proposals vs. Work Items and formal Acceptance bit is just over-the-top. If it were my CG (😎) I'd just have the chairs maintain a list of the "active" proposals, knowing that some things will go stale because an editor goes on parental leave or something. As the chairs shepherd the group forward they'd adjust the "active" list accordingly, and hear which proposals might want to consider graduating.

charter.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
charter.html Show resolved Hide resolved
charter.html Show resolved Hide resolved
charter.html Show resolved Hide resolved
@hober

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

hober commented Feb 10, 2020

Okay, I think this is a good batch of updates. I'd like to land it, once @erik-anderson approves. There is a bit of followup work; see #11.

charter.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
charter.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
hober and others added 2 commits Feb 10, 2020
fix typo
Co-Authored-By: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@gmail.com>
@hober hober removed the do not merge label Feb 11, 2020
@hober hober changed the title WIP: Update charter and homepage based on feedback in #2 and #3. Update charter and homepage based on feedback in #2 and #3. Feb 11, 2020
@hober hober changed the title Update charter and homepage based on feedback in #2 and #3. Update charter given feedback in #2, #3, #6, #8, and #10. Feb 11, 2020
@hober hober merged commit 32bd9e8 into master Feb 11, 2020
@hober hober deleted the incubation branch Feb 11, 2020
@hober hober mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2020
@hober hober moved this from In Progress to Done in Process / Charter updates Feb 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.