Ulex Open Source Legal Operating System Version 1.1 (2017)
1. Procedural Rules
1.1. Procedural Principles
ALI & International Institute for the Unification of Law, Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure (2004).
1.2. Default Procedural Rules
Each party chooses a judge and those two judges choose a third.1
The judges choose one party's proposed remedy.2
The losing party pays the winning party's legal costs.3
2. Substantive Rules
2.1. Tort Law
2.1.2. Defective Products
2.1.3. Shared Blame
2.1.4. Personal Harm
2.2. Property Law
ALI, Restatement of Property (1936-40).4
2.3. Contract Law
2.4. Additional Restatements of the Common Law
2.4.1. Conflict of Laws
2.4.2. Unfair Competition
2.4.3. Suretyship and Guaranty
2.4.6. Restitution and Unjust Enrichment
2.5. Uniform Commercial Codes
2.5.1. General Provisions
ALI & and Uniform Law Commission (ULC), Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), Article 1: General Provisions (2001).
2.5.2. Leases of Goods
ALI & ULC, UCC Article 2A: Leases (2002).
2.5.3. Negotiable Instruments
ALI & ULC, UCC Article 3: Negotiable Instruments (2002).
2.5.5. Funds Transfers
ALI & ULC, UCC Article 4A: Funds Transfers (2012).
2.5.6. Letters of Credit
ALI & ULC, UCC Article 5: Letters of Credit (1995).
2.5.7. Documents of Title
ALI & ULC, UCC Article 7: Documents of Title (2003).
2.5.8. Investment Securities
ALI & ULC, UCC Article 8: Investment Securities (1994).
2.5.9. Secured Transactions
ALI & ULC, UCC Article 9: Secured Transactions (2010).
2.6. Natural Persons
2.6.2. Wards and Protected Persons
2.7. Legal Persons
2.7.1. Nonprofit Corporations
2.7.3. Business Organizations
ULC, Uniform Business Organizations Code (UBOC), Article 1: The Hub (2013).
2.7.4. Conversions and Mergers
ULC, UBOC, Article 2: Model Entity Transaction Act (2013).
ULC, UBOC, Article 3: Uniform Partnership Act (2013).
2.7.6. Limited Partnerships
2.7.7. Limited Liability Companies
2.7.8. Cooperative Associations
2.7.9. Unincorporated Nonprofits
2.7.10. Business Trusts
2.8. Substantive Administrative Rules
2.8.1. Electronic Signatures
2.8.2. Electronic Recording
2.8.3. Priority of Title to Real Property
Any conveyance of an interest in real property that has not been recorded in the relevant land records office, if any, shall be void as against any subsequent transfer of a conflicting interest for value paid in good faith, recorded earlier.5
Adulthood, age of consent, majority, and capacity to contract begin 18 years after a person's birth.6
2.8.5. Time Limits
A cause of action subject to the statute of limitations or a claim against adverse possession or prescription expires seven years after its accrual.
2.9. Substantive Catchall Rule
No controversy left unresolved by application of these rules may be decided contrary to common practice, the general tenor of these rules, or a decent respect for human dignity.
3.1. Alternative Rules
If a rule offers alternative provisions, the alternative offered first prevails over any later one.
3.2. Alternative Meanings
If a rule refers to an institution, office, power, or privilege that does not exist in a jurisdiction running Ulex, the rule instead refers to the closest functionally equivalent institution, office, power, or privilege that does or could exist in one.
3.3. Conflicting Rules
If different rules give conflicting results, the rule listed later in this index prevails, but no rule can prevail over this one.
4. Optional Criminal Law Module
4.1. Criminal Procedural Rules
4.2 Criminal Substantive Rules
5. Optional Integration Module (for adoption by host sovereign)
5.1. Sole Grounds for Revoking Agreement to Resolve Dispute Under Ulex.
A written agreement to resolve a dispute under Ulex shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable except upon such grounds as exist at the time of its forming in law or equity for revocation of a contract.7
5.2. Sole Grounds for Modifying or Correcting Judgment Rendered Under Ulex.
A court may modify or correct a judgment rendered under Ulex only upon application by a party subject to it and upon proof that: 1) The judgment includes an evident and material numerical error or misidentification of a person or thing named therein; 2) The judges decided a question outside of their authority in a manner that substantively altered their decision upon matters properly addressed; or 3) The judgment bears an imperfection in form not affecting its substance. The court may then only modify or correct the judgment, and then only so far as necessary to effectuate the evident intent of the judgment and promote justice between the parties.8
5.3. Force and Effect of Court Confirmation.
A party moving for a court order confirming a judgment rendered under Ulex shall file proof that the parties agreed to submit to that judgment, that it was rendered in accord with the referenced rules, and that the judgement issued as described. Absent application of Rules 5.1 and 5.2, above, the court receiving the motion shall give it the same force and effect in all respects as any judgment issued by the court, and the judgment shall be so treated by all persons, institutions, officers, or agents presented with the same.9
1 See, United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration Art. 10(2) (2006) (setting default number of arbitrators at 3); id. Art. 11(3)(a) (describing method by which panel of three arbitrators chosen). See also , American Arbitration Association, Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures R-12(b) & R-13 (2013) (setting forth similar procedure).
2 See, e.g. , Major League Baseball, 2012 - 2016 Basic Agreement Art. VI, § E(13), p.22 (2016) (visited April 28, 2016) ("The arbitration panel shall be limited to awarding only one or the other of the two [remedies] submitted.").
3 See , American Law Institute & International Institute for the Unification of Law, Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure Principle 25 (2004) (codifying the rule).
4 Though the ALI no longer offers bound versions of this Restatement for sale, it remains available via the online sources listed in footnote 3, above. It provides a few crucial rules, though much of its coverage has been superseded by later-published Restatements covering specific areas of property law.
5 Here, Ulex adopts the race-notice form of recording statute most common in the United States. See , Ray E. Sweat, Race, Race-Notice and Notice Statutes: The American Recording System, 3 PROBATE & PROPERTY 27 (May/June 1989) (cataloging popularity of various recording statutes and providing model race-notice statute). This rule would apply only if the adopting jurisdiction had created a land records office as envisioned by the ULC, Uniform Real Property Electronic Recording Act (2005).
6 Many of the rule sets used in Ulex invoke age-related classifications, making a uniform definition of adulthood useful. Elsewhere, age-related classifications vary across and even within legal systems. Ulex sets the default at a relatively common age — 18 years old — leaving precocious children to bring suit for emancipation, as in ULC, Uniform Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Act § 210 (1997), or leaving adopting communities free to set a different default age for adulthood.
7 Compare , Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 2.
8 Compare, id. § 13.
9 Compare, id. § 13.