Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What can't it do? #12

Closed
naggie opened this issue Jun 12, 2013 · 8 comments
Closed

What can't it do? #12

naggie opened this issue Jun 12, 2013 · 8 comments

Comments

@naggie
Copy link

naggie commented Jun 12, 2013

Under things it can't do according README.md:

  • Multi-node. Not a huge leap, but this isn't the project for it. Maybe as Super Dokku.
  • Multitenancy. It's ready for it, but again, probably for Super Dokku.

Does this mean I can't deploy more than 1 node app (or ruby) app at time time, or something else?

@frillip also.

@rnorth
Copy link
Contributor

rnorth commented Jun 12, 2013

Hi,
No it doesn't mean that - @progrium please correct me if I'm misunderstanding your intent, but I take from this:

  • No multi-node = dokku itself will only run on a single host (VM/physical server), rather than a coordinated cluster of many hosts. As a result, an app deployed to dokku wouldn't be scaled beyond a single instance.
  • No multitenancy = no separation between users; i.e. you're either authenticated or you're not, with no sense of app ownership. As such, you'd only use dokku in an environment where your users can trust each other

There are other PaaS platforms that do support such concepts, but they're orders of magnitude more complex - so I think it's a really good thing that dokku remains simple and focused on doing core functionality well.

You should be able to deploy multiple apps of any supported language at any time.
Hope this helps
Richard

@naggie
Copy link
Author

naggie commented Jun 12, 2013

Thanks, that clears it up.

The context of 'node' was not obvious to me.

@naggie naggie closed this as completed Jun 12, 2013
@progrium
Copy link
Contributor

Updating docs to avoid confusion.

@reverie
Copy link

reverie commented Feb 1, 2015

This still needs to be clarified.

@progrium
Copy link
Contributor

progrium commented Feb 1, 2015

Not sure what you mean. Please be more specific in what needs to be
clarified. This has since been resolved in the docs:
http://progrium.viewdocs.io/dokku/index

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Badr notifications@github.com
wrote:

This still needs to be clarified.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#12 (comment).

Jeff Lindsay
http://progrium.com

@reverie
Copy link

reverie commented Feb 1, 2015

The content I see on that page is almost exactly the same as in naggie's original bug report. Does multitenancy mean multiple apps or multiple users with distinct security privileges?

@progrium
Copy link
Contributor

progrium commented Feb 1, 2015

There is no real concept of users, but multiple apps, sure. I'll update that part.

@reverie
Copy link

reverie commented Feb 1, 2015

Thanks! Would have made me more confident before digging in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants