Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 19, 2018. It is now read-only.

Use list of Providers instead of magic key naming #81

Closed
goern opened this issue May 26, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Use list of Providers instead of magic key naming #81

goern opened this issue May 26, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
feature
Milestone
CDK 2 beta-3

Comments

@goern
Copy link
Contributor

goern commented May 26, 2015

Rework the spec the same way we did it with #35 so that we can fix #70
@goern goern added the feature label May 26, 2015
@goern goern added this to the Red Hat Summit 2015 milestone May 26, 2015
@aweiteka
Copy link
Contributor

I'm okay with how it is: the provider keys are magical.

@goern
Copy link
Contributor Author

goern commented May 27, 2015

@tradej @vpavlin any opinion?

@tradej
Copy link
Contributor

tradej commented May 27, 2015

Since we intend to support a limited number of providers with non-overlapping names, I'm also in favour of the status quo.

@vpavlin
Copy link
Contributor

vpavlin commented May 28, 2015

I am definitely in favour of making my life easier and using current structure.

@vpavlin vpavlin closed this as completed May 28, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
CDK 2 beta-3
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@goern @tradej @aweiteka @vpavlin