Datamodel for VXLAN encapsulation support #1065
2 times, most recently
Mar 27, 2019
Apr 4, 2019
OK - I think this is good to go.
There is an outstanding question about whether we need an additional field for the node IP address that isn't a subfield of the BGP struct, since VXLAN requires the node IP but doesn't use BGP.
I think we can merge as-is though, and then deliberate on whether we want to do anything about that afterwards.
One option might to add a new top-level field and deprecate the BGP one, and then switching clients over to using the new field for both BGP and VXLAN, falling back on the BGP field if the top-level isn't present.