Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop all non-generic write paths #1594

Closed
fabxc opened this Issue Apr 25, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@fabxc
Copy link
Member

fabxc commented Apr 25, 2016

No description provided.

@fabxc fabxc added the enhancement label Apr 25, 2016

@fabxc fabxc added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Apr 25, 2016

@brian-brazil

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

brian-brazil commented Apr 25, 2016

We might want to block this on having a generic write path. There were a small handful of users experimenting with this, I don't know if any of them made it as far as production though.

@fabxc

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

fabxc commented Apr 25, 2016

Realistically generic write won't happen for 1.0.0.

Let's mark OpenTSDB and InfluxDB both as unstable/experimental/scheduled
for removal then?

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:34 PM Brian Brazil notifications@github.com
wrote:

We might want to block this on having a generic write path. There were a
small handful of users experimenting with this, I don't know if any of them
made it as far as production though.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1594 (comment)

@brian-brazil

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

brian-brazil commented Apr 25, 2016

Marking them all as deprecated sounds good for 1.0.0.

@juliusv

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

juliusv commented Apr 25, 2016

👍 for marking deprecated until generic write.

@fabxc fabxc added kind/enhancement and removed enhancement labels Apr 28, 2016

@rvrignaud

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

rvrignaud commented Jun 6, 2016

Will there be any alternative for influxdb as durable storage on 1.0 ?

@brian-brazil brian-brazil removed this from the v1.0.0 milestone Jun 15, 2016

@brian-brazil brian-brazil changed the title Drop InfluxDB write path Drop all non-generic write paths Oct 26, 2016

@gouthamve

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

gouthamve commented Mar 20, 2017

Can this be closed now?

@juliusv

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

juliusv commented Mar 20, 2017

Yes, thanks!

@juliusv juliusv closed this Mar 20, 2017

@lock

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

lock bot commented Mar 23, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 23, 2019

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
You can’t perform that action at this time.