Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upSwitch remaining metrics to seconds #1606
Comments
brian-brazil
added
the
kind/enhancement
label
Apr 29, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Some of the quantile summaries should also be histograms for aggregations. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Most of those summaries should be just changed not to have quantiles imho. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
What's the benefit of removing them? They are not exactly expensive in the On Fri, Apr 29, 2016, 7:50 PM Brian Brazil notifications@github.com wrote:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
I think they're of low value and potentially confusing given the disproportionate importance that is attached to quantiles compared to their actual utility. Histhograms are also favoured, so if we really need this data (I think we can live without) we should use those. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
+1 for changing everything to seconds. I find some of the quantiles extremely useful. In general, if the latency of a single host matters, no aggregation is needed, and precomputed quantiles are very handy. A Prometheus server is a good example where you are interested in the latency of a single server. At SC, we use a number of quantiles exposed by the Prometheus server quite regularly. We can go through all the summaries and decide for each one which of the following is the right course of action: (a) remove, (b) turn into histogram, or (c) leave it as is is. |
brian-brazil
added this to the v1.0.0 milestone
Jun 23, 2016
fabxc
closed this
Jun 23, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Problem is that some non-second metrics come from the infamous I see the following possibilities:
(3) Has the problem that we probably want to revisit the metrics provided by |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Reopening to not lose track. |
beorn7
reopened this
Jun 23, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Metrics are not part of our stability guarantees. Holding of 1.0 for just that doesn't seem appropriate. |
fabxc
removed this from the v1.0.0 milestone
Jun 24, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Fine with me. So consensus is (2) then? @brian-brazil ? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
2 is what I was thinking. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Cool. I'll close this again, then, because the metric change will happen implicitly with the move to the new client library. |
beorn7
closed this
Jun 24, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
lock
bot
commented
Mar 24, 2019
|
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
brian-brazil commentedApr 29, 2016
There's still a handful of metrics in Prometheus not using seconds, mostly around storage. We should switch them to seconds for consistency.
While it's proposed that it's okay to change this sort of thing post 1.0, it'd be best to get it in before that.