Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GetBoundaryValues() and GetRangeValues() should return labels in SampleSets #26

Closed
juliusv opened this Issue Jan 8, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@juliusv
Copy link
Member

juliusv commented Jan 8, 2013

I've only tested GetRangeValues() so far, but maybe GetBoundaryValues() has the same behavior. The SampleSets that get returned have a nil-map as the Metric member, whereas they should probably contain the labels that the function was called with, to yield a proper timeseries.

It's not a big problem right now, because the caller has the right labels anyways and can insert them. However, I'm not sure if that's intended.

@ghost ghost assigned matttproud Jan 8, 2013

@matttproud

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

matttproud commented Mar 28, 2013

@juliusv, is this still relevant?

@juliusv

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

juliusv commented Mar 28, 2013

The view and storage methods now only take fingerprints, so while some of them still do metric lookups for those, I don't want to require them to do that anymore (and don't need it). Right now I get the fingerprints myself in the view adapter and this is fine. Closing this.

@juliusv juliusv closed this Mar 28, 2013

matttproud added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 9, 2014

Merge pull request #26 from prometheus/feature/fingerprinting/set
Add formal fingerprint sets for intersection ops.

simonpasquier pushed a commit to simonpasquier/prometheus that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2017

Merge pull request prometheus#26 from prometheus/stability
Add FAQ section on stability guarantees.
@lock

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

lock bot commented Mar 25, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 25, 2019

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
You can’t perform that action at this time.