Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upPrometheus 2.0: remote storage configuration is ignored #3095
Comments
tomwilkie
added
the
component/remote storage
label
Aug 21, 2017
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Yes, this change has been ported to v2 yet. The remote code in master is ahead in many ways, once we get 1.8 out I'll sync them up. |
brian-brazil
added
the
dev-2.0
label
Aug 21, 2017
brian-brazil
added this to the v2.x milestone
Aug 21, 2017
tomwilkie
referenced this issue
Oct 23, 2017
Merged
Update remote storage APIs from 1.8 branch #3336
tomwilkie
closed this
in
#3336
Oct 26, 2017
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
lock
bot
commented
Mar 23, 2019
|
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
lock
bot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Mar 23, 2019
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
AlekSi commentedAug 20, 2017
github.com/prometheus/prometheus/config.QueueConfigvalues are ignored indev-2.0branch. This structure is duplicated bygithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/remote.QueueManagerConfigwhich is not configurable.In #2552 @brian-brazil wrote
I want to increase
max_samples_per_sendbecause 100 samples per insert is too small value for PromHouse and ClickHouse.Also, I would like to see
QueueManagerConfigremoved – that's one of the places where Prometheus duplicates the same code in different packages.I can work on it if you are ok with it.
/cc @tomwilkie