Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upinmemory Prometheus #4412
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
With such a setup, everything is already in memory. This sounds more like a usage question so it makes more sense to ask questions like this on the prometheus-users mailing list rather than in a GitHub issue. On the mailing list, more people are available to potentially respond to your question, and the whole community can benefit from the answers provided. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
szuecs
closed this
Jul 25, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
lock
bot
commented
Mar 22, 2019
|
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
lock
bot
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Mar 22, 2019
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
szuecs commentedJul 24, 2018
Proposal
As Prometheus user, that scrapes and queries only 1-5 minutes rate data, I would like to have the option to not save files and work fully inmemory, because the performance of Prometheus v2.2.1 in small Kubernetes clusters is not as I would expect.
Background
I deploy prometheus as statefulset with scrape interval 15s and have 1000m CPU and 4G memory set.
You can see the full configuration at https://github.com/zalando-incubator/kubernetes-on-aws/tree/dev/cluster/manifests/prometheus.
Monitor the monitor dashboard (Go metrics and Prometheus QPS and number of scrapes)

CPU metrics details

Memory metrics
