New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement: Need Port reservation support for DRONE(Linux) Ports #144

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this Issue Jul 2, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@GoogleCodeExporter
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.client will run in windows machine 1(WM1) and Linux server is DRONE
2.I am sending traffic from eth1 to eth2(Loopback)
3.Try to access the same ports eth1 ans eth2 from other ostinato client which 
is runing in windows machine(WM2)

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
WM2 should not able to access the same ports as those are already using by WM1

But current behaviour is other clients able to access and control the 
ports,Port Reservation is not supported as of now

What version and revision of the product are you using (available in the
About dialog)? On what operating system?

ANY Operating System

Please provide any additional information below.

This Port Reservation will make ostinato more secure and also cleared N number 
of Security Thereats

Hope I will get this feature ASAP

Original issue reported on code.google.com by middelas...@gmail.com on 4 Feb 2015 at 7:05

@GoogleCodeExporter

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GoogleCodeExporter

GoogleCodeExporter Jul 2, 2015

This feature is more to do with cooperative use of a shared resource rather 
than security

Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com on 23 Feb 2015 at 2:01

  • Changed state: Accepted
This feature is more to do with cooperative use of a shared resource rather 
than security

Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com on 23 Feb 2015 at 2:01

  • Changed state: Accepted
@GoogleCodeExporter

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GoogleCodeExporter

GoogleCodeExporter Jul 2, 2015

Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com on 27 Feb 2015 at 3:33

  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com on 27 Feb 2015 at 3:33

  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect
@GoogleCodeExporter

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@GoogleCodeExporter

GoogleCodeExporter Jul 2, 2015

This issue was closed by revision 850f862cb905.

Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com on 2 May 2015 at 6:21

  • Changed state: Fixed
This issue was closed by revision 850f862cb905.

Original comment by pstav...@gmail.com on 2 May 2015 at 6:21

  • Changed state: Fixed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment