Skip to content

BF: Fix order of dataFileName and addInfoFromUrl (#4831) #5171

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2022

Conversation

shabkr
Copy link
Contributor

@shabkr shabkr commented Oct 12, 2022

This fixes a bug where participant ids provided via URL parameters are not being added to the data filename of experiments run online (#4831). dataFileName assignment should come after addInfoFromUrl so that URL parameters (such as participant id) can be added to the filename.

dataFileName assignment should come after addInfoFromUrl so that URL
parameters (such as participant id) can be added to the filename.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #5171 (e4e30fb) into release (867f241) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           release    #5171      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    45.77%   45.76%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          307      307              
  Lines        61670    61670              
  Branches     10761    10246     -515     
===========================================
- Hits         28229    28225       -4     
- Misses       30978    30980       +2     
- Partials      2463     2465       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
psychopy/visual/textbox2/textbox2.py 78.55% <0.00%> (-0.25%) ⬇️
psychopy/visual/window.py 62.42% <0.00%> (-0.15%) ⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@peircej peircej requested a review from TEParsons October 14, 2022 13:41
@TEParsons
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for this, took a minute for me to work backwards and see what we got wrong but I see it now and your fix is exactly right. I'll pull in now, thanks for contributing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants