diff --git a/.agents/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md b/.agents/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
index 27f1238e..2349271d 100644
--- a/.agents/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ Rules that bind this task: quote `code-review`'s "Review the Change" section int
   the Return line below, not a PR comment or a coverage marker.
 Return: one finding per line, file:line, the concrete failure scenario, no severity theater.
 Bounds: read-only. No edit, no stage, no commit, no push, no PR-hosted write of any kind.
-Close: quote `AGENTS.md`'s own unresolved-rule closing line ("Context and Delegation
-  Discipline") into the prompt, do not restate it here.
+<AGENTS.md's own unresolved-rule closing line, quoted verbatim from "Context and Delegation
+  Discipline", not restated here>
 ```
 
 **Model tier:** the strongest tier this session can reach, per `AGENTS.md` "Match the model tier to the judgment" and "Never tier down the seat holding the judgment", applied here to the reviewer rather than the author. Run the pass on the same tier that authored the change when only one tier is reachable, a second, adversarially-prompted look still catches what the authoring pass's own "looks ready" judgment did not.
diff --git a/.claude-plugin/fleet-skills/.source-digest b/.claude-plugin/fleet-skills/.source-digest
index f470fe62..39a139f0 100644
--- a/.claude-plugin/fleet-skills/.source-digest
+++ b/.claude-plugin/fleet-skills/.source-digest
@@ -1 +1 @@
-4dbdf71167625f52
+2044c888625ec970
diff --git a/.claude-plugin/fleet-skills/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md b/.claude-plugin/fleet-skills/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
index 27f1238e..2349271d 100644
--- a/.claude-plugin/fleet-skills/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
+++ b/.claude-plugin/fleet-skills/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ Rules that bind this task: quote `code-review`'s "Review the Change" section int
   the Return line below, not a PR comment or a coverage marker.
 Return: one finding per line, file:line, the concrete failure scenario, no severity theater.
 Bounds: read-only. No edit, no stage, no commit, no push, no PR-hosted write of any kind.
-Close: quote `AGENTS.md`'s own unresolved-rule closing line ("Context and Delegation
-  Discipline") into the prompt, do not restate it here.
+<AGENTS.md's own unresolved-rule closing line, quoted verbatim from "Context and Delegation
+  Discipline", not restated here>
 ```
 
 **Model tier:** the strongest tier this session can reach, per `AGENTS.md` "Match the model tier to the judgment" and "Never tier down the seat holding the judgment", applied here to the reviewer rather than the author. Run the pass on the same tier that authored the change when only one tier is reachable, a second, adversarially-prompted look still catches what the authoring pass's own "looks ready" judgment did not.
diff --git a/.github/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md b/.github/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
index 27f1238e..2349271d 100644
--- a/.github/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
+++ b/.github/skills/local-strict-review/SKILL.md
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ Rules that bind this task: quote `code-review`'s "Review the Change" section int
   the Return line below, not a PR comment or a coverage marker.
 Return: one finding per line, file:line, the concrete failure scenario, no severity theater.
 Bounds: read-only. No edit, no stage, no commit, no push, no PR-hosted write of any kind.
-Close: quote `AGENTS.md`'s own unresolved-rule closing line ("Context and Delegation
-  Discipline") into the prompt, do not restate it here.
+<AGENTS.md's own unresolved-rule closing line, quoted verbatim from "Context and Delegation
+  Discipline", not restated here>
 ```
 
 **Model tier:** the strongest tier this session can reach, per `AGENTS.md` "Match the model tier to the judgment" and "Never tier down the seat holding the judgment", applied here to the reviewer rather than the author. Run the pass on the same tier that authored the change when only one tier is reachable, a second, adversarially-prompted look still catches what the authoring pass's own "looks ready" judgment did not.