Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Map specific field with a custom mapper #106

Closed
slemesle opened this issue Aug 1, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

Map specific field with a custom mapper #106

slemesle opened this issue Aug 1, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels
new feature
Milestone
1.0 Final

Comments

@slemesle
Copy link

slemesle commented Aug 1, 2016

We should be able to map a specific field pair using a custom mapper.
This will provide the ability to define mapping per field and per type.
@slemesle slemesle modified the milestones: 0.15, 1.0 Final Aug 1, 2016
slemesle added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2016
@slemesle
#106: First working custom field to field mapper
1301379
slemesle added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2016
@slemesle
#106: Allow one value when using @fiedl(value = "prop", withCustom = …
1d1c675 
…Custom.class).

Update documentation to reflect latest changes.
Improve validation error reporting for @field parsing
slemesle added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2016
@slemesle
#106: Add compilation error when no custom mapping method is found fo…
61719d4 
…r a field requiring it
slemesle added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 1, 2016
@slemesle
#106: Add a test to check custom mapper errors also applies in @field(…
f87fb09 
…withCustom ...)
slemesle added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2016
@slemesle
#106: Add support for interceptor in custom field to field mapping
e2e1e78
@slemesle slemesle closed this as completed Aug 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
new feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0 Final
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@slemesle